Abstract

Potentially, the participation of small and medium-sized businesses in cross-border cooperation in the border regions of the country should intensify its development, bring specificity to it. However, the analysis showed that there is no noticeable specificity in the dynamics of employment in the field of small and medium-sized businesses in non-priority geostrategic border areas in comparison with other regions of Russia, incl. the crisis year 2020. As in the country as a whole, the development of small and medium-sized businesses in these border areas is difficult, unstable, multidirectional, moreover, in line with the longterm tendency towards its curtailment. Against the background of a generally unfavorable economic, including entrepreneurial, climate, the specifics of the functioning of small and medium-sized businesses in the border areas are hardly distinguishable. This lack of distinction confirms the low estimates of the degree of openness of the Russian economy, the fact that a significant part of the border regions are depressed. With a low level of openness, the potential opportunities from cross-border and other economic cooperation with foreign countries in such Russian territories are poorly realized and play a secondary role. Nonpriority border regions to a greater extent perform “barrier functions” due to geostrategic reasons, rather than the functions of economic growth points.

Highlights

  • Во входящих в Уральский федеральный округ приграничных областях с 2017 по 2020 г. прирост средней численности работников у индивидуальных предпринимателей составил: в Тюменской области – 23,03%, в Челябинской области – 4,45%, но в Курганской области за этот период падение составило 9,0%

  • Подводя итоги анализа динамики средней численности работников МСП, приходится констатировать, что специфические условия неприоритетных приграничных регионов не привносят заметной специфики в динамику занятости на малых и средних предприятиях, у индивидуальных предпринимателей

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Падение средней численности работников малых предприятий составило 14,46%, в Волгоградской области – 15,85%, в Краснодарском крае – 4,45%, в Ростовской области – 7,81%. Падение средней численности работников малых предприятий составило 14,68%, в Саратовской области – 10,95%. Падение средней численности работников малых предприятий составило 15,33%, в Тюменской области – 4,47%, в Челябинской области – 9,09%.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call