Abstract
ABSTRACT Applying the upcoming technologies in agriculture has been a major economic, environmental and social challenge for scientists and farmers. In order to overcome such challenge, this study evaluated the advantages and limitations of using geostatistics and machine learning for soil mapping in agricultural practices and soil surveys. The study occurred in Tocantins State, Brazil, and consisted into seven areas with a total extension of 17.24 km2, 222 meters regular gridded resulting in one-point sampling per 0.0493 km2 of five randomly sampled cores within a 1 m circle radius. It was collected 332 georeferenced soil samples at 0-20 cm depth using an auger and then, soil laboratory analyses performed. Afterward, liming rate maps were originated from the predicted soil attributes clay, cation exchange capacity and base saturation comparing four methods: ordinary kriging, random forest, cubist, support vector machine and the best model results of each soil attribute. Evaluating the methods, the Pearson’s index presented strong results for soil attributes predicted by random forest and ordinary kriging. Machine learning methods can be successfully applied for soil mapping in agricultural practices and soil surveys using less soil samples rather than geostatistical framework.
Highlights
Applying the upcoming technologies in agriculture has been an enjoyable challenge for scientists and agricultural entrepreneurs
In order to solve this issue, this study evaluates the advantages and limitations of using geostatistics or machine learning for soil mapping in agricultural practices and soil surveys
We create a liming rate map originated from the predicted soil attributes cation exchange capacity and base saturation comparing four methods: ordinary kriging, random forest, cubist, support vector machine and the best model results of each soil attribute
Summary
Applying the upcoming technologies in agriculture has been an enjoyable challenge for scientists and agricultural entrepreneurs. The challenge is to reach economic, environmental and social sustainability by using these technologies in the field of agricultural practices. Techniques such as geostatistics and machine learning have been performed in land management (Rodrigo-Comino et al, 2018), crop yield prediction (Adamchuk et al, 2017), soil type mapping (Demattê et al, 2015) and zone management (Castro-Franco et al, 2018). We create a liming rate map originated from the predicted soil attributes cation exchange capacity and base saturation comparing four methods: ordinary kriging, random forest, cubist, support vector machine and the best model results of each soil attribute
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.