Abstract

The demise of Miocene carbonate build-ups in the Browse Basin, Northwest Australia, has been explained as relating to geological and oceanographic processes. These include accelerated tectonic subsidence driven by subduction, ocean cooling following the mid-Miocene climate optimum, nutrient excess, poisoning by sediment drifts and local erosion driven by current winnowing, occurring discretely or simultaneously. Here, we critically assess the evidence for these different mechanisms using a combination of high-resolution 3-D seismic data, regional 2-D seismic profiles, and numerical stratigraphic forward modelling. Seismic interpretation and numerical modelling found that the proposed uniform subsidence rate of 125 m/Ma between 16.5 Ma and 5.33 Ma for the northern Browse Basin (Belde et al., 2017), when combined with the published estimate of eustatic sea level in Miller et al. (2005), was insufficient to drown the Miocene carbonate sequence and generate the geomorphological changes (barrier reef to isolated carbonate build-ups) observed on seismic data. Instead, a subsidence profile comprising pulses of rapid and slow subsidence is required. Significantly, our results suggest that subsidence rates exceeded 400 m/Ma in the northern Browse Basin, and that parts of the basin record the accumulation of sediment drifts. These sediment drifts are interpreted to have buried some carbonate build-ups, while suspended sediment reduced light transmissivity, inhibiting carbonate production. Thus, we postulate that current activity and excess nutrient supply are key, but often overlooked, oceanographic processes that lead to the demise of carbonate build-ups.

Highlights

  • Drowned carbonate build-ups are common throughout the Phanerozoic geological record (Schlager, 1981; Hallock and Schlager, 1986)

  • Authors have postulated that environmental decline in the form of ocean cooling following the mid-Miocene climate optimum (Isern et al, 1996), nutrient excess (Howarth and Alves, 2016), as well as sediment drifts and erosion driven by current winnowing (Belde et al, 2017), suppressed carbonate production to the point where it was unable to keep-up with relative sea-level rise

  • While Model Run 5 replicated a basin evolution similar to that observed on seismic data (Fig. 14), it suggests that the demise of the carbonate sequence occurred before the end of the Miocene

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Drowned carbonate build-ups are common throughout the Phanerozoic geological record (Schlager, 1981; Hallock and Schlager, 1986). Authors have postulated that environmental decline in the form of ocean cooling following the mid-Miocene climate optimum (Isern et al, 1996), nutrient excess (Howarth and Alves, 2016), as well as sediment drifts and erosion driven by current winnowing (Belde et al, 2017), suppressed carbonate production to the point where it was unable to keep-up with relative sea-level rise. All these conceptual models are still subject to debate. 3) What is the validity of CarboCAT numerical models in assisting the interpretation of carbonate sequences on 3-D seismic data?

Meso-Cenozoic evolution of the Browse Basin
Data and methods
Seismic interpretation of Miocene growth patterns
Appearance of sediment drifts between BB3 to BB5
Summary of seismic interpretation
Regional evolution
Discussion
Pulsed subsidence profile as explaining stratal geometry on seismic data
Findings
Model constraints
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call