Geometry- and QTAIM-Based Comparison of Intramolecular Charge-Inverted Hydrogen Bonds, M···(H-Si) "Agostic Bond", and M···(η(2)-SiH) σ Interactions.

Abstract

Using large sets of systems having an intramolecular charge-inverted hydrogen bond (IMCIHB), M···(Ha-Si) "agostic bond" or M···(η(2)-SiH) σ interaction, we have compared both geometric and QTAIM-based topological parameters characterizing all these three types of interactions. It is shown that IMCIHBs can be distinguished from the other relevant interactions by the significantly less elongated Si-H bond. The other geometric parameters are not characteristic because they accept wide ranges of values in systems having either an M···(Ha-Si) "agostic bond" or M···(η(2)-SiH) σ interaction. If QTAIM-based results are investigated, then it is shown that an IMCIHB can be characterized by the position of the BCPH···M that is closer to the metal atom, whereas, quite the contrary, this BCP has been found to be closer to the agostic hydrogen in complexes having either M···(Ha-Si) or M···(η(2)-SiH) interactions. Another difference is in the curvature of the M···H bond path. If the M···H bond path tracing the M···(H-E) (E = Si, C) interaction is curved, then this curvature appears near the agostic hydrogen-a property particularly pronounced in M···(Ha-C) agostic bonds. Moreover, it has also been shown that an IMCIHB can be characterized by lower curvatures and, in general, lower values of the electron density computed at BCPH···Al than at BCPs of either M···(Ha-Si) or M···(η(2)-SiH) interactions. Importantly, IMCIHBs can be distinguished from the other two types of interactions on the basis of values of delocalization index, which are significantly lower for IMCIHBs. Other QTAIM-based parameters have occurred to be not characteristic for IMCIHBs due to wide ranges of their values obtained for M···(Ha-Si) and M···(η(2)-SiH) interactions. It has also been shown that the PBE0 functional gives the best molecular structure in comparison with experimental data.