Abstract

Stag beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Lucanidae) have received extensive attention from researchers in behavioral ecology and evolutionary biology. There have been no previous quantitative analyses, particularly using a geometric morphometric approach based on a large sample of data, to shed light on the morphological diversity and evolution of Lucanidae. Thoracic adaptation and ecological differentiation are intimately related, and the pronotum bears important muscles and supports the locomotion of prothoracic legs. The elytron is an autapomorphy of the Coleoptera. To reconstruct and visualize the patterns of evolutionary diversification and phylogenetic history of shape change, an ancestral groundplan can be reconstructed by mapping geometric morphometric data onto a phylogenetic tree. In this study, the morphologies of the pronotum and elytron in 1303 stag beetles (Lucanidae), including approximately 99.2% of all globally described species, were examined, thus revealing several aspects of morphological diversity and evolution. First, on the basis of geometric morphometric analysis, we found significant morphological differences in the pronotum or elytron between any two Lucanidae subfamilies. And we subsequently reconstructed the ancestral groundplans of the two structures in stag beetles and compared them with those of extant species (through cladistic and geometric morphometric methods). The ancestral groundplan of Lucanidae was found to be most similar to extant Nicagini in both the pronotum and elytron, according to Mahalanobis distances. Furthermore, we analyzed species richness and morphological diversity of stag beetles and the relationships between them and found that the two parameters were not always correlated. Aesalinae was found to be the most diverse subfamily in both the pronotum and elytron, despite its poor species richness, and the diversity of the pronotum or elytron was not superior in Lucaninae, despite its high species richness. Our study provides insights into the morphological variations and evolutionary history of the pronotum and elytron in four subfamilies of stag beetles, and it illuminates the relationship between morphological diversity and species richness. Intriguingly, our analysis indicates that morphological diversity and species richness are not always correlated. These findings may stimulate further studies in this field.

Highlights

  • Stag beetles (Lucanidae) comprise more than 1300 described species, which are grouped into over 100 genera and exist in all zoogeographical regions except Antarctica (Fujita 2010; Kim and Farrell 2015)

  • Geometric morphometric analysis of the variations in the pronotum and elytron were based on one curve for each structure (Fig. 1), and the curves for the pronotum or elytron were resampled by length after 25 and 50 semi-landmarks (SLM), respectively

  • There was a significant difference between Lucaninae or Syndesinae and the outgroups, but the morphology of Aesalinae and Lampriminae could not be distinguished from the morphologies of Glaresidae, Scarabaeidae, or Trogidae (Table S7, S9)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stag beetles (Lucanidae) comprise more than 1300 described species, which are grouped into over 100 genera and exist in all zoogeographical regions except Antarctica (Fujita 2010; Kim and Farrell 2015). A new genus has been proposed, and a phylogenetic tree of Lucanidae based on two gene regions of ribosomal DNA has indicated the monophyly of four subfamilies (Paulsen 2013). Both morphological diversity and species richness are important in the study of diversity. The species richness of stag beetles has been revealed through various monographs (Fujita 2010; Maes and Pinratana 2003; Paulsen 2010), descriptions of new species (Okuda 2012b; Nguyen 2013) and reviews of certain taxa (Paulsen and Mondaca 2006; Huang and Chen 2012)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.