Abstract
Geometric morphometric methods (GMMs) were used to determine if scale morphology can discriminate between genera, species, geographic variants, and stocks of mullet (Mugilidae). GMMs were used because they allow standard multivariate analyses while preserving information about scale shape, which is important in making biological interpretations of results. The method was tested on ctenoid scales from mullets collected from different areas of the Gulf of Mexico and Aegean Sea. Scales were submitted to generalised procrustes analysis, followed by principal components analysis of resulting shape coordinates. Principal component scores were submitted to cross-validated discriminant analysis to determine the efficacy of scale landmarks in discriminating by taxon and population. Fish scale form was least effective in discriminating populations from nearby areas, better when populations are more geographically dispersed, and best between species and genera. Scale form variations reflected previous genetic studies that differentiated congeneric Mugil cephalus and Mugil curema, which are distinct from other Mugilidae. The method is nondestructive, quick, and less costly than genetic analysis, thus allowing many individuals to be screened.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
