Abstract

This paper deals with the measurement of the compatibility in a local AHP-Group Decision Making context. Compatibility between two individuals or decision makers is understood as the property that reflects the proximity between their positions or preferences, usually measured by a distance function. An acceptable level of incompatibility between the individual and the group positions will favour the acceptance of the collective position by the individuals. To facilitate the compatibility measurement, the paper utilises four indicators based on log quadratic distances between matrices or vectors which can be employed in accordance with the information that is available from the individual decision makers and from the group. The indicators make it possible to measure compatibility in decision problems, regardless of how the collective position and the priorities are obtained. The paper also presents a theoretical framework and a general, semi-automatic procedure for reducing the incompatibility measured by the four indicators. Using relative variations, the procedure identifies and slightly modifies the judgement of the collective matrix that further improves the indicator. This process is undertaken without modifying the initial information provided by the individuals. A numerical example illustrates the application of the theoretical framework and the procedure.

Highlights

  • One of the most outstanding characteristics of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [1,2]is its suitability for addressing multiactor decision making in the three scenarios detailed by [3,4]: Group Decision Making (GDM); Negotiated Decision Making (NDM) and Systemic Decision Making (SDM).In the first (GDM), under the principle of consensus, the individuals work together searching for a common goal

  • It is necessary to measure the level of incompatibility and establish procedures for its reduction. This question is especially relevant in Consensus Reaching Processes (CRPs) where the participation of the decision makers is limited to the incorporation of their preferences at the beginning of the process

  • The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 outlines the background of AHP-Group Decision Making (AHP-GDM) and the measurement of compatibility in AHP; Section 3 presents four compatibility measures based on log quadratic distances; Section 4 sets out the theoretical results necessary for the reduction of incompatibility using these measures; Section 5 includes a general, semi-automatic procedure for reducing the incompatibility measured with the different geometric compatibility (GCOMPI) by revising judgements of the collective matrix; Section 6 highlights the most important conclusions of the study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the most outstanding characteristics of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [1,2]. In [5], the authors, propose a semi-automatic procedure (AEM-COM) to reduce the incompatibility measured by an indicator (GCOMPI) that combines the individual judgement matrices (input of the model) and the collective priority vector (output of the model). The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 outlines the background of AHP-GDM and the measurement of compatibility in AHP; Section 3 presents four compatibility measures based on log quadratic distances; Section 4 sets out the theoretical results necessary for the reduction of incompatibility using these measures; Section 5 includes a general, semi-automatic procedure for reducing the incompatibility measured with the different GCOMPIs by revising judgements of the collective matrix; Section 6 highlights the most important conclusions of the study

AHP in a Multiactor Decision Making Context
Compatibility in AHP-GDM
Compatibility Indexes in AHP
Geometric Compatibility Indexes for Families of Matrices and Vectors
GCOMPI1
GCOMPI3
GCOMPI4
Prioritisation Method
Numerical Example
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.