Abstract

Two types of errors resulting from the numerical evaluation of a transducer's spatial impulse response function have been identified, One is geometric and is due to the mismatch between the emulated piston surface (approximated using many small planar elements) and the true surface. The other error is algebraic and is due to the inexact formulation of the response of the emulated surface. The deviations from the true response were calculated for three different pistons. The results indicate that the shape and placement of the elements are important for the computational accuracy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.