Abstract

The convective state of the top of Earth's outer core is still under debate. Conflicting evidence from seismology and geomagnetism provides arguments for and against a thick stably stratified layer below the core-mantle boundary. Mineral physics and cooling scenarios of the core favor a stratified layer. However, a non-zero secular variation of the total geomagnetic energy on the core-mantle boundary is evidence for the presence of radial motions extending to the top of the core. We compare the secular variation of the total geomagnetic energy with the secular variation of the geomagnetic dipole intensity and tilt. We demonstrate that both the level of cancellations of the sources and sinks of the dipole intensity secular variation, as well as the level of cancellations of the sources and sinks of the dipole tilt secular variation, are either larger than or comparable to the level of cancellations of the sources and sinks of the total geomagnetic energy secular variation on the core-mantle boundary, indicating that the latter is numerically significant hence upwelling/downwelling reach the top of the core. Radial motions below the core-mantle boundary are either evidence for no stratified layer or to its penetration by various dynamical mechanisms, most notably lateral heterogeneity of core-mantle boundary heat flux.

Highlights

  • In the outer core of the Earth, the turbulent convective flow of an electrically conducting fluid drives the geodynamo

  • We show that non-zero secular variation (SV) of the total poloidal magnetic energy on the core-mantle boundary (CMB) requires kinetic to magnetic energy transfer

  • In most cases εe is larger than εmz and εme, i.e., there are fewer cancellations in the integrand of the SV of the total geomagnetic energy

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In the outer core of the Earth, the turbulent convective flow of an electrically conducting fluid drives the geodynamo. Christensen (2018) showed for strong stratification that the layer is not penetrated, and the magnetic field becomes too dipolar and too axisymmetric compared to the geomagnetic field (Christensen et al, 2010) due to a strong skin effect (Christensen, 2006; Nakagawa, 2011) Such strong stratification would prevent the impact of CMB heterogeneity on the deeper core (e.g. by prescribing preferential inner core growth as proposed by Aubert et al, 2008). Here we compare the level of cancellations in the integrand of the SV of the total magnetic energy with that of the SV of the equatorial dipole These ratios are computed based on the geomagnetic field and SV from several historical (Jackson et al, 2000; Gillet et al, 2015) and satellites (Finlay et al, 2015, 2016b) models.

Energy Transfers at the Top of the Core With Radial Magnetic Field
Dipole Moment Changes
Measures of the Level of Cancellations in the Integrands
Changes in the Total Geomagnetic Energy
Changes in the Geomagnetic Dipole
Comparing Total Geomagnetic Energy and Dipole Changes
Can Magnetic Diffusion Explain the Changes in the Total Geomagnetic Energy?
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call