Abstract

AbstractThe Huangshilao gold deposit (>13.5 t Au) is comprised of stratabound pyrite‐dominant massive sulfide ores, and is distinguished from the skarn Cu, Au, and Cu–Au deposits that are dominant in the Tongguanshan orefield, Tongling, east‐central China. The stratabound orebodies are situated along flexural slip faults along the unconformity between the Upper Devonian Wutong and the Upper Carboniferous Huanglong Formations. The ores, dominated by crystallized pyrite, colloform pyrite, and pyrrhotite, are systematically sampled from the underground stopes along strike drifts. The δ34S values of ore sulfides yield a wide variation from −11.3 to 11.4‰, but mostly within 4–8‰, corresponding to the δ34S range (3.4–8.7‰) of the Yanshanian Tongguanshan and Tianshan quartz diorite intrusions in the Tongguanshan orefield, suggesting a magmatic dominated sulfur source. Few obvious negative δ34S values are induced by an involvement of sedimentation‐related biogenic sulfur. The wide δ34S variation denotes an incongruent physical and chemical interaction of the two sources. Combined analysis of gold contents and sulfur isotopes of the sulfides show that the magmatic hydrothermal solution provides primary metals despite a small quantity that may have been contributed by the sedimentary pyrites. The hydrothermal alteration, thermal metamorphism, trace element concentration in pyrites, and existing aeromagnetic data jointly suggest that the hydrothermal fluid migrated vertically from an intrusion below, along the flexural slip faults, but not laterally from the nearby outcrop of Tianshan stock.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call