Abstract

In response to the internship supply/demand imbalance, the field of psychology recognized a crisis andproposed solutions. With each passing year, however, graduate students face the real possibility that theymay not match. Using four years worth of site match rates, competitiveness is quantified and analyzedwith respect to implications for the field, APPIC, internship sites, graduate programs, and prospectiveinterns. Results suggest geographic differences in match rates are less meaningful for applicant strategiesthan monitoring competitiveness using site match rates and submitting 10 to 15 applications. Discussionincludes implications for students and how they may use match rate data to improve their site selectionstrategies and chances for a successful match.Keywords: internship, supply demand, APPIC, imbalance, competition

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.