Abstract

This article assesses whether knowledge spillovers are localised and then examines the determinants of localisation using patent citations of Australian patents registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Advances in communications technologies have reduced the cost of information transmission, particularly in the last three decades. However, tacit knowledge is still costly to transmit over geographical distance. The literature suggests that those individuals that are close to the source of the invention benefit more than distant ones. Australia, with its geographical isolation and large distances between its major cities, is used as testing ground for this hypothesis. The results show that there is evidence for geographical localisation of knowledge flows at various levels of geographical aggregation, the localisation effects diminish over time, and the more general patents are less localised.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.