Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate regional variations in the management, complications, and total cost of admission for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by elective posterior spinal surgery (PSF, ≥4 levels). The Kids' Inpatient Database year 2012 was queried and adolescent patients (age 10-17 years old) with AIS undergoing elective PSF (≥4 levels) were selected. The primary outcome was regional variations for intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of surgery, and total cost of admission after elective PSF intervention. In our cohort of 3759 adolescent patients identified, 704 (18.7%) patients were treated in the Northeast, 917 (24.4%) in the Midwest, 1329 (35.4%) in the South, and 809 (21.5%) in the West (Northeast: n= 704; Midwest: n= 917; South: n= 1329; West: n= 809). The Northeast had the greatest complication rate, followed by the Midwest, South, and West region cohorts (Northeast: 27.7% vs. Midwest: 24.5% vs. South: 23.0% vs. West: 17.2%, P<0.001). On average, length of surgery was shortest in the South (Northeast: 5.3 ± 2.7 days vs. Midwest: 5.3 ± 3.1 days vs. South: 4.9 ± 3.1 days vs. West: 5.3 ± 2.1 days, P<0.001), while the total cost of admission was greatest in the West (Northeast: $51,760 ± $25,177 vs. Midwest: $55,201 ± $23,750 vs. South: $58,847 ± $28,227 vs. West: $60,636 ± $29,372, P < 0.001). Our study suggests that there may be regional variations in health care resource utilization in AIS patients undergoing multilevel posterior spinal fusions. Further study is warranted to determine the specific factors contributing to disparities in regional outcomes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.