Abstract
We document large and persistent differences in the acquisitiveness of firms in the U.S. based on the location of their headquarters. We hypothesize and find evidence that local peer effects in M&A activity contribute to such persistence. Specifically, the acquisitiveness of non-dominant industry firms in an economic area (EA) relates positively to valuations and idiosyncratic return shocks of local dominant industry firms. Local spillover effects are stronger for firms headquartered in EAs with higher M&A activity and dominant industries in these EAs are subject to larger positive valuation shocks. Overall, our results suggest that firms perceive the valuations of their local peers as informative for their acquisition decisions. The market seems skeptical with respect to firms responding to local peer valuation shocks as we find an inverse relation between announcement returns and idiosyncratic returns shocks of their local dominant industry peers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
