Geochronology and petrogenesis of the Qibaoshan Cu-polymetallic deposit, northeastern Hunan Province: Implications for the metal source and metallogenic evolution of the intracontinental Qinhang Cu-polymetallic belt, South China

Abstract

The recently recognized Qinhang metallogenic belt (QHMB) is an economically important intracontinental Mesozoic porphyry-skarn Cu-polymetallic metallogenic belt in South China. However, the origin of the ore-bearing magma and the major factors controlling the different metal assemblages in the QHMB are still unclear. The Qibaoshan deposit is a large Cu–Au–Pb–Zn–Ag–Fe deposit located at the juncture between the northern and central parts of the QHMB. In this study, new zircon U–Pb ages, Hf–O isotopic data, molybdenite Re–Os ages, and whole-rock geochemical data are combined to constrain the timing of the mineralization and the origin and petrogenesis of the ore-bearing porphyry in the Qibaoshan deposit. The ages obtained from both zircon U–Pb and molybdenite Re–Os dating fall in the Late Jurassic (between 152.7 and 148.3 Ma), revealing that this deposit is significantly younger than previously estimated (227–184 Ma). The Qibaoshan ore-bearing quartz porphyry shows variable negative zircon εHf(t) values (−14.8 to −5.5), high δ18O values (8.4 to 10.8‰), and high Mg# values (69.1 to 73.0), indicating that it formed via the partial melting of ancient crust triggered by the injection of mantle-derived magma. Zircon Hf–O isotopic modeling of the mixing of two extreme endmembers indicates that the magmatic source comprised ~70–80% reworked ancient crustal components and ~20–30% depleted mantle components. Based on comparisons with other ore-bearing porphyries in the QHMB, a magmatic source dominated by crust-derived material and relatively low oxygen fugacities (ΔFMQ −1.8 to ΔFMQ +0.8) was responsible for the high (Pb + Zn)/Cu ratio in the Qibaoshan deposit, and the Pb, Zn and Ag were mainly derived from the reworked ancient crust. Although four analyses of inherited Neoproterozoic zircons (~800 Ma) have variable positive εHf(t) values (0.72 to 11.21), indicating that Neoproterozoic juvenile crust was involved in the formation of the Qibaoshan ore-bearing quartz porphyry, the relatively low oxygen fugacities (ΔFMQ −1.2 to ΔFMQ +0.4) of the parent magma of these inherited zircons suggest that this parent magma could not have provided significant metallic Cu for mineralization in the Qibaoshan Cu-polymetallic deposit. Therefore, the metallic Cu in the Qibaoshan Cu-polymetallic deposit was probably provided by the injection of the mantle-derived magma. Because ore-forming magmas with relatively low oxygen fugacities have low Au solubility, the large Au mineralization in the Qibaoshan deposit may be related to high background values of Au in this area. Our data, integrated with regional petrogeochemical data, indicate that the magmatic source exerted a first-order control on the different metal assemblages in the deposits in the QHMB.