Geochemistry of granulite facies BIFs from the Luis Alves Craton (Southern Brazil): Implications for Archean-Paleoproterozoic depositional and tectonic settings

Abstract

Banded Iron Formations (BIF) developed strongly during the Neoarchean – Paleoproterozoic Eras linked with global environmental processes such as the Great Oxidation Event (GOE) and changes in geodynamics, sea level, geobiology, hydrothermal systems, and sediment deposition conditions. BIF development and distribution worldwide are also related to supercontinent cycles, being a powerful tool to understand the evolution of plate tectonics. In this paper, we used field-based geological-structural data, petrography, X-ray diffraction, and lithogeochemical analyses to perform the first characterization of Banded Iron Formations at the Luis Alves Craton (LAC), Southern Brazil. The LAC BIF are classified as oxide and silicate facies, both with granoblastic texture. Oxide facies consists of quartz and magnetite. Besides these minerals, silicate facies contains olivine and ferrosilite, evidencing granulite metamorphism. Based on major elements oxide facies has a hydrothermal signature, with low content of Al2O3 and TiO2, whereas silicate facies register a continental sediment contribution been more enriched in these elements, MgO, MnO, and CaO. Trace-elements also indicate the main source for both silicate and oxide facies, which is seawater with a major influence of low-T hydrothermal sources, besides continental sedimentation sources. The Ce/Ce × anomaly is true negative, representing oxidizing waters, which also may represent a shallow water column depth. The depositional environment is inferred as a shallow, restricted basin. Oxide facies represents sedimentation closer to hydrothermal vents and with weak influence from continental clastic sedimentation, while silicate facies represent sedimentation closer to an adjoining continental landmass. Oxide facies has more Algoma-like characteristics, such as higher Fe and Eu contents, Sm/Yb and Eu/Sm typical of higher hydrothermal fluid inputs, and low siliciclastic contribution. On the other hand, silicate facies resembles Superior-type BIF, with higher siliciclastic contribution, negative Ce/Ce × anomalies, and Eu/Eu* <1.8. In summary, we propose the LAC BIF is representative of a transitional environment from Algoma-to Superior-type. The first depositions of the LAC BIFs may have developed within an Algoma-like environment during the Neoarchean. The waning tectonic and volcanic activity during the Siderian shifted to a platformal environment, with shallower waters that may induce the deposition of carbonates typical of Superior-type deposits. The depositional basin may have been closed by the Rhyacian and those sediments were then pushed down to the lower crust and underwent granulite facies metamorphism.