Abstract

OECD consultation documents and corporate sector responses relating to transfer pricing reform and the taxation of the digital economy between 2010 and 2020 are analysed through the lens of classical value theory. In the transfer pricing context, “value creation” came to mean business functions outside the classical production boundary, and in the digital economy context, a variety of heterodox positions were adopted, with recognition of the classical production boundary being conspicuous by its absence. Seemingly, profitability had to be allocated outside the bounds of the firm, given that to some extent value is created elsewhere and captured by it, but rich states and corporate capital were only willing to allocate it downstream in global value chains, where consumption is predominantly located, i.e. not upstream in global value chains to the lower-income states where, in the classical production framework, value creation is predominantly situated.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.