Abstract

The genotype-specific defense activation in the roots of perennial tree crops to soilborne necrotrophic pathogens remains largely unknown. A recent phenotyping study indicated that the apple rootstock genotypes B.9 and G.935 have contrasting resistance responses to infection by Pythium ultimum. In the current study, a comparative transcriptome analysis by Illumina Solexa HiSeq 3000 platform was carried out to identify the global transcriptional regulation networks between the susceptible B.9 and the resistant G.935 to P. ultimum infection. Thirty-six libraries were sequenced to cover three timepoints after pathogen inoculation, with three biological replicates for each sample. The transcriptomes in the roots of the susceptible genotype B.9 were reflected by overrepresented differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with downregulated patterns and systematic suppression of cellular processes at 48 h post inoculation (hpi). In contrast, DEGs with annotated functions, such as kinase receptors, MAPK signaling, JA biosynthesis enzymes, transcription factors, and transporters, were readily induced at 24 hpi and continued up-regulation at 48 hpi in G.935 roots. The earlier and stronger defense activation is likely associated with an effective inhibition of necrosis progression in G.935 roots. Lack of effector-triggered immunity or existence of a susceptibility gene could contribute to the severely disturbed transcriptome and susceptibility in B.9 roots. The identified DEGs constitute a valuable resource for hypothesis-driven studies to elucidate the resistance/tolerance mechanisms in apple roots and validating their potential association with resistance traits.

Highlights

  • Apple replant disease (ARD) is a serious hindrance to the establishment of economically viable orchards on replant sites

  • Based on the number of identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs), the susceptible B.9 rootstock had a dramatically perturbated root transcriptome associated with P. ultimum infection (Table 1)

  • Results from the current study suggest that efficient and coordinated activation of several molecular components are needed for a successful resistance response, including early signal transduction (RLKS, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and R-proteins), biosynthesis of defense hormone (JA and ET) and secondary metabolites (CHI and UGT), defense related transcription factors (TFs) (WRKY, bHLH, ethylene responsive factors (ERFs), and MYB), and transporters (ABC transporter and MATE efflux family protein)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Apple replant disease (ARD) is a serious hindrance to the establishment of economically viable orchards on replant sites. Pre-plant fumigation of orchard soils to eradicate ARD pathogens has been the primarily available control method for ARD6, but the currently available fumigants are under increasingly regulatory restriction due to environmental concerns. Maximized exploitation of naturally existing resistance traits can offer a more costeffective and durable control strategy for the management of soilborne diseases in tree fruit production systems. The conventional breeding for perennial tree crops with the aim of incorporating root resistance traits is a lengthy and resource-demanding process with poor predictability. This is due to the complex disease etiology of ARD, the perennial nature of apple as a tree crop, and the lack of reliable screening methods for root resistance to ARD. Elucidation of the molecular defense activation patterns and identification of key regulatory genes of resistance traits in apple roots could offer the opportunity

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.