Abstract

Cassava brown steak disease (CBSD), caused by Cassava brown streak virus (CBSV) and Ugandan cassava brown streak virus (UCBSV), is the most important biotic constraint to cassava production in East and Central Africa. Concerted efforts are required to prevent further spread into West Africa as well as to reduce losses in areas already affected. The study reported here was part of a five-country (Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania and Uganda) programme that aimed to identify superior cassava cultivars resistant to CBSD and to disseminate them widely in the region. Seventeen tissue-cultured and virus-tested cultivars were evaluated in Tanzania across nine sites with diverse CBSD inoculum conditions. Experiments were planted using an alpha-lattice design and assessments were made of surrounding inoculum pressure, CBSD foliar and root incidence and root yield at harvest. There were large differences in CBSD infection between sites, with greatest spread recorded from the north-western Lake (Victoria) zone. Differences were driven by Bemisia tabaci whitefly vector abundance and CBSD inoculum pressure. Both CBSV and UCBSV were almost equally represented in cassava fields surrounding experimental plots, although CBSV predominated in the north-west whilst UCBSV was more frequent in coastal and southern sites. However, the incidence of CBSV was much greater than that of UCBSV in initially virus-free experimental plots, suggesting that CBSV is more virulent. Cultivars could be categorised into three groups based on the degree of CBSD symptom expression in shoots and roots. The seven cultivars (F10_30R2, Eyope, Mkumba, Mkuranga1, Narocass1, Nase3 and Orera) in the most resistant category each had shoot and root incidences of less than 20%. Fresh root yield differed between sites and cultivars, but there was no genotype by environment interaction for this trait, probably attributable to the large fertility and soil moisture differences between sites. Susceptible cultivars and the local check performed well in the absence of CBSD pressure, highlighting the importance of exploiting quality and yield traits of local landraces in breeding programmes. Overall, our results emphasized the importance of applying a balanced strategy for CBSD management. This should use both improved and local germplasm resources to generate high yielding cultivars for specific end-user traits, and combine the deployment of improved cultivars with phytosanitary control measures including the use of healthy planting material and planting during periods of reduced CBSD infection.

Highlights

  • Cassava is an important source of food to many people in the tropics and sub-tropical locations of the world where its key role as a subsistence crop is significant as well as its use in industrial processing (Ceballos et al 2012)

  • The situation was similar for whitefly abundance where all Lake Zone (LZ) sites had higher whitefly abundances than all Coastal Zone (CZ) sites, the high degree of variability meant that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of sites

  • A multi-location evaluation of elite cassava cultivars was conducted in Tanzania between November 2015 and April 2017 during which 17 cultivars were evaluated at each of nine sites

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cassava is an important source of food to many people in the tropics and sub-tropical locations of the world where its key role as a subsistence crop is significant as well as its use in industrial processing (Ceballos et al 2012). The impact of this work continues to be constrained by the current unfavourable regulatory conditions in most of the countries either directly affected or threatened by CBSD. This situation has forced researchers in the region to continue to rely on conventional breeding approaches (Kaweesi et al 2014; Kawuki et al 2016; Tumwegamire et al 2018), albeit supported by other biotechnological approaches such as marker-assisted breeding (Amuge et al 2017; Anjanappa et al 2018). Both CMBs and CBSIs are transmitted by the same whitefly vector, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Dubern, 1994; Maruthi et al 2005)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.