Abstract

BackgroundThe genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of the young individuals in the XIV QTL-MAS workshop dataset were predicted by three methods: best linear unbiased prediction with a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix (TABLUP), ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (RRBLUP), and BayesB.MethodsThe TABLUP method is identical to the conventional BLUP except that the numeric relationship matrix is replaced with a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix (TA). The TA matrix was constructed based on both marker genotypes and their estimated effects on the trait of interest. The marker effects were estimated in a reference population consisting of 2 326 individuals using RRBLUP and BayesB. The GEBV of individuals in the reference population as well as 900 young individuals were estimated using the three methods. Subsets of markers were selected to perform low-density marker genomic selection for TABLUP method.ResultsThe correlations between GEBVs from different methods are over 0.95 in most scenarios. The correlations between BayesB using all markers and TABLUP using 200 or more selected markers to construct the TA matrix are higher than 0.98 in the candidate population. The accuracy of TABLUP is higher than 0.67 with 100 or more selected markers, which is nearly equal to the accuracy of BayesB with all markers.ConclusionsTABLUP method performed nearly equally to BayesB method with the common dataset. It also provides an alternative method to predict GEBV with low-density markers. TABLUP is therefore a promising method for genomic selection deserving further exploration.

Highlights

  • The genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of the young individuals in the XIV QTL-MAS workshop dataset were predicted by three methods: best linear unbiased prediction with a trait-specific markerderived relationship matrix (TABLUP), ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (RRBLUP), and BayesB

  • With the availability of whole genome high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips in many livestock and plant species, methods using the genomic information to detect the underling architecture of complex traits have become popular

  • The aim of this study is to validate the TABLUP method and compare it with the ridge regression BLUP (RRBLUP) and the BayesB method using the simulated common dataset provided in the XIV QTL-MAS workshop

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of the young individuals in the XIV QTL-MAS workshop dataset were predicted by three methods: best linear unbiased prediction with a trait-specific markerderived relationship matrix (TABLUP), ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (RRBLUP), and BayesB. The method to predict genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) with whole-genome markers was termed genomic selection, as proposed by Meuwissen et al [1]. The general idea of genomic selection is to estimate the effects of dense markers that are. The aim of this study is to validate the TABLUP method and compare it with the ridge regression BLUP (RRBLUP) and the BayesB method using the simulated common dataset provided in the XIV QTL-MAS workshop. We tried to assess the performance of different methods and explain the results either with or without knowing the simulated true breeding values (TBV)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call