Abstract

Traditional breeding strategies for selecting superior genotypes depending on phenotypic traits have proven to be of limited success, as this direct selection is hindered by low heritability, genetic interactions such as epistasis, environmental-genotype interactions, and polygenic effects. With the advent of new genomic tools, breeders have paved a way for selecting superior breeds. Genomic selection (GS) has emerged as one of the most important approaches for predicting genotype performance. Here, we tested the breeding values of 240 maize subtropical lines phenotyped for drought at different environments using 29,619 cured SNPs. Prediction accuracies of seven genomic selection models (ridge regression, LASSO, elastic net, random forest, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, Bayes A and Bayes B) were tested for their agronomic traits. Though prediction accuracies of Bayes B, Bayes A and RKHS were comparable, Bayes B outperformed the other models by predicting highest Pearson correlation coefficient in all three environments. From Bayes B, a set of the top 1053 significant SNPs with higher marker effects was selected across all datasets to validate the genes and QTLs. Out of these 1053 SNPs, 77 SNPs associated with 10 drought-responsive transcription factors. These transcription factors were associated with different physiological and molecular functions (stomatal closure, root development, hormonal signaling and photosynthesis). Of several models, Bayes B has been shown to have the highest level of prediction accuracy for our data sets. Our experiments also highlighted several SNPs based on their performance and relative importance to drought tolerance. The result of our experiments is important for the selection of superior genotypes and candidate genes for breeding drought-tolerant maize hybrids.

Highlights

  • Traditional breeding strategies for selecting improved and resistant varieties of maize depending on the phenotypic trait have proven to be of limited success (Cushman and Bohnert, 2000)

  • The performance of 7 agronomic traits—anthesissilking Interval (ASI), Grain yield (GY), number of kernels per row (KR), number of kernel rows (KRN), Ear girth (EG), Ear length (EL), and 100 kernel weight (HKW) were recorded in all three locations

  • Our results showed that Bayes B is superior to the other genomic selection (GS) models in predicting the genomic values of the studied genotypes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Traditional breeding strategies for selecting improved and resistant varieties of maize depending on the phenotypic trait have proven to be of limited success (Cushman and Bohnert, 2000) This direct selection is hindered by low heritability, and the existence of genetic interaction (e.g., epistasis), environmental-genotype interaction, and polygenic effects. Markerassisted breeding is limited to few major QTLs, minor QTLs are not part of the selection process, leading to a loss of genetic gain (Dekkers, 2004) To overcome this limitation, genomic selection (GS) has been proposed as a method to understand the effects of all the alleles across the genome to improve polygenic traits (Meuwissen et al, 2001). This method is advantageous over the traditional marker-assisted selection (MAS), as it addresses the effect of small genes which cannot be captured by the traditional MAS (Hayes et al, 2009)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call