Abstract

This study investigated the reliability of genomic prediction (GP) using breed origin of alleles (BOA) approach in the Nordic Red (RDC) population, which has an admixed population structure. The RDC population consists of animals with varying degrees of genetic materials from the Danish Red (RDM), Swedish Red (SRB), Finnish Ayrshire (FAY), and Holstein (HOL) because bulls have been used across the breeds. The BOA approach was tested using 39,550 RDC animals in the reference population and 11,786 in the validation population. Deregressed proofs (DRP) of milk, fat and protein were used as response variable for GP. Direct genomic breeding values (DGV) for animals in the validation population were calculated with (BOA model) or without (joint model) considering breed origin of alleles. The joint model assumed homogeneous marker effects and a single set of marker effects were estimated, whereas BOA model assumed heterogeneous marker effects, and different sets of marker effects were estimated across the breeds. For the BOA approach, we tested scenarios assuming both correlated (BOA_cor) and uncorrelated (BOA_uncor) marker effects between the breeds. Additionally, we investigated GP using a standard Illumina 50K chip and including SNP selected from imputed whole-genome sequencing (50K+WGS). We also studied the effect of estimating (co)variances for genome regions of different sizes to exploit the information of the genome regions contributing to the (co)variance between the breeds. Region sizes were set as 1 SNP, a group of 30 or 100 adjacent SNP, or the whole genome. Reliability of DGV was measured as squared correlations between DGV and DRP divided by the reliability of DRP. Across the 3 traits, in general, RS30 and RS100 SNP yielded the highest reliabilities. Including WGS SNP improved reliabilities in almost all scenarios (0.297 on average for 50K and 0.307 on average for 50K+WGS). The BOA_uncor (0.233 on average) was inferior to the joint model (0.339 on average), but the reliabilities obtained using BOA_cor (0.334 on average) in most cases were not significantly different from those obtained using the joint model. The results indicate that both including additional whole-genome sequencing SNP and dividing the genome into fixed regions improve GP in the RDC. The BOA models have the potential to increase the reliability of GP, but the benefit is limited in populations with a high exchange of genetic material for a long time, as is the case for RDC.

Highlights

  • Genomic prediction (GP; Meuwissen et al, 2001) is widely used to estimate breeding values of selection candidates

  • The results indicate that both including additional whole-genome sequencing SNP and dividing the genome into fixed regions improve GP in the Red dairy cattle (RDC)

  • ChromoPainterV2 analysis identified the presence of genomic traces of all the original breeds (RDM, Finnish Ayrshire (FAY), SRB) and HOL in the RDC animals used in this study, and revealed a high degree of admixture in each of them, which has been reported in previous studies (Makgahlela et al, 2013; Gautason et al, 2019)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Genomic prediction (GP; Meuwissen et al, 2001) is widely used to estimate breeding values of selection candidates. Genomic prediction relies on the consistency of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the QTL and SNP between the reference and target populations. It has been successful in situations where the reference and target populations are from the same breed (VanRaden and Sullivan, 2010; Lund et al, 2011). Differences in SNP effects challenge both acrossand multi- breed predictions, in which the results differ depending on the models and traits analyzed (Erbe et al, 2012; Zhou et al, 2014; Calus et al, 2018)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call