Abstract
Simple SummaryAlthough much progress has been made in recent years in the clinical management of solid tumors, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a malignancy with limited therapeutical options. Indeed, responses to standard chemotherapy and targeted therapies vary widely when administered to unselected patient populations. This is in part due to the heterogeneous and variable molecular profile of PDAC. Here, we review current knowledge about the genomic heterogeneity of PDAC and its impact on disease behavior, and treatment including the molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance.Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death due to limited advances in recent years in early diagnosis and personalized therapy capable of overcoming tumor resistance to chemotherapy. In the last decades, significant advances have been achieved in the identification of recurrent genetic and molecular alterations of PDAC including those involving the KRAS, CDKN2A, SMAD4, and TP53 driver genes. Despite these common genetic traits, PDAC are highly heterogeneous tumors at both the inter- and intra-tumoral genomic level, which might contribute to distinct tumor behavior and response to therapy, with variable patient outcomes. Despite this, genetic and genomic data on PDAC has had a limited impact on the clinical management of patients. Integration of genomic data for classification of PDAC into clinically defined entities—i.e., classical vs. squamous subtypes of PDAC—leading to different treatment approaches has the potential for significantly improving patient outcomes. In this review, we summarize current knowledge about the most relevant genomic subtypes of PDAC including the impact of distinct patterns of intra-tumoral genomic heterogeneity on the classification and clinical and therapeutic management of PDAC.
Highlights
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal types of cancer [1], which may become the second leading cause of cancer-related death in 2030 [1,2]
At present, it is well established that virtually all PDAC carry activating mutations of KRAS (93% of tumors) [9,10] and inactivating alterations of the CDKN2A/p16 (95%) [3], TP53 (72–74%) [6,9], and SMAD4/DPC4 (50–78%) genes [3,6,9,11], which progressively accumulate from early pancreatic pre-neoplastic lesions to late-stage metastatic disease [12]
Other specific subtypes of PDAC have been identified which display distinct gene expression profiling (GEP) related to immune cell function [61], TILs, and/or mechanisms for evading the host immune response [9,52,53,54,55,90] which range from immunogenic to immunosuppressive tumor immune profiles associated with the morphologic appearance of the tumor and the behavior of the disease [84]
Summary
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal types of cancer [1], which may become the second leading cause of cancer-related death in 2030 [1,2]. Alterations of chromosomes 4, 7, 9q34 17q, and 20, in the absence of abnormalities involving chromosome 18q, including specific (numerical) alterations of chromosomes 4, 7, and 9q34 [11] and gains/amplification of chromosome 8q24, 17q, and 20q, have all been associated with more extended and disseminated disease at diagnosis and/or a poorer patient outcome [8,11,13,41,42,43] In parallel, to these genetic studies, gene expression profiling (GEP) has been extensively applied to define subgroups of PDAC patients with different clinical outcomes. Further efforts have been dedicated to a more accurate definition of distinct molecular subtypes of PDAC with potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications via integration of genomic, transcriptomic, and/or epigenomic data
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.