Abstract
BackgroundGenomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is a statistical method used to predict breeding values using single nucleotide polymorphisms for selection in animal and plant breeding. Genetic effects are often modeled as additively acting marker allele effects. However, the actual mode of biological action can differ from this assumption. Many livestock traits exhibit genomic imprinting, which may substantially contribute to the total genetic variation of quantitative traits. Here, we present two statistical models of GBLUP including imprinting effects (GBLUP-I) on the basis of genotypic values (GBLUP-I1) and gametic values (GBLUP-I2). The performance of these models for the estimation of variance components and prediction of genetic values across a range of genetic variations was evaluated in simulations.ResultsEstimates of total genetic variances and residual variances with GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 were close to the true values and the regression coefficients of total genetic values on their estimates were close to 1. Accuracies of estimated total genetic values in both GBLUP-I methods increased with increasing degree of imprinting and broad-sense heritability. When the imprinting variances were equal to 1.4% to 6.0% of the phenotypic variances, the accuracies of estimated total genetic values with GBLUP-I1 exceeded those with GBLUP by 1.4% to 7.8%. In comparison with GBLUP-I1, the superiority of GBLUP-I2 over GBLUP depended strongly on degree of imprinting and difference in genetic values between paternal and maternal alleles. When paternal and maternal alleles were predicted (phasing accuracy was equal to 0.979), accuracies of the estimated total genetic values in GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 were 1.7% and 1.2% lower than when paternal and maternal alleles were known.ConclusionsThis simulation study shows that GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 can accurately estimate total genetic variance and perform well for the prediction of total genetic values. GBLUP-I1 is preferred for genomic evaluation, while GBLUP-I2 is preferred when the imprinting effects are large, and the genetic effects differ substantially between sexes.
Highlights
Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is a statistical method used to predict breeding values using single nucleotide polymorphisms for selection in animal and plant breeding
In scenario 3, the predictive abilities of GBLUPI1 were not affected by the values of Nm and Nf whereas the ρ values with GBLUP-I2 decreased as the difference between Nm and Nf decreased (Table 6)
In scenario 4, for all values of H2 the estimated variance components obtained with GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 were close to the true values (Table 7)
Summary
Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is a statistical method used to predict breeding values using single nucleotide polymorphisms for selection in animal and plant breeding. Many livestock traits exhibit genomic imprinting, which may substantially contribute to the total genetic variation of quantitative traits. We present two statistical models of GBLUP including imprinting effects (GBLUP-I) on the basis of genotypic values (GBLUP-I1) and gametic values (GBLUP-I2). Over 70 imprinted genes have been identified in mice [5], and 24 genes with parent-of-origin effects in beef cattle [6]. Quantitative traits such as carcass composition, growth, teat number, and litter size have been suggested to exhibit imprinting effects [7,8,9,10]. Imprinting effects may substantially contribute to the total genetic variation of quantitative traits
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.