Abstract

Detection of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow is an established negative prognostic factor. We isolated small pools of (~20) EPCAM-positive DTCs from early breast cancer patients for genomic profiling. Genome-wide copy number profiles of DTC pools (n = 45) appeared less aberrant than the corresponding primary tumors (PT, n = 16). PIK3CA mutations were detected in 26% of DTC pools (n = 53), none of them were shared with matched PTs. Expression profiling of DTC pools (n = 30) confirmed the upregulation of EPCAM expression and certain oncogenes (e.g., MYC and CCNE1), as well as the absence of hematopoietic features. Two expression subtypes were observed: (1) luminal with dual epithelial–mesenchymal properties (high ESR1 and VIM/CAV1 expression), and (2) basal-like with proliferative/stem cell-like phenotype (low ESR1 and high MKI67/ALDH1A1 expression). We observed high discordance between ESR1 (40%) and ERRB2 (43%) expression in DTC pools vs. the clinical ER and HER2 status of the corresponding primary tumors, suggesting plasticity of biomarker status during dissemination to the bone marrow. Comparison of expression profiles of DTC pools with available data from circulating tumor cells (CTCs) of metastatic breast cancer patients revealed gene expression signatures in DTCs that were unique from those of CTCs. For example, ALDH1A1, CAV1, and VIM were upregulated in DTC pools relative to CTCs. Taken together, analysis of pooled DTCs revealed molecular heterogeneity, possible genetic divergence from corresponding primary tumor, and two distinct subpopulations. Validation in larger cohorts is needed to confirm the presence of these molecular subtypes and to evaluate their biological and clinical significance.

Highlights

  • Efforts toward detection and characterization of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) have been actively pursued to shed light on their molecular nature and to evaluate their potential clinical utility as biomarkers.[1,2,3] While many studies have shown that the presence of DTCs is strongly associated with poor patient outcomes,[4,5,6] testing for DTCs has not been incorporated into standard clinical practice due to a lack of consensus on methods for detection of these cells.[1,7] DTC assays have often relied on immunocytochemistry or polymerase chain reaction-based methods to detect the presence of these cells in the bone marrow.[1]

  • DTCs can be enumerated by immunomagnetic enrichment and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (IE/FACS) Bone marrow aspiration was performed in the operating room immediately prior to breast surgery

  • Samples were analyzed via IE/FACS assay to detect and enumerate DTCs (Fig. 1a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Efforts toward detection and characterization of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) have been actively pursued to shed light on their molecular nature and to evaluate their potential clinical utility as biomarkers.[1,2,3] While many studies have shown that the presence of DTCs is strongly associated with poor patient outcomes,[4,5,6] testing for DTCs has not been incorporated into standard clinical practice due to a lack of consensus on methods for detection of these cells.[1,7] DTC assays have often relied on immunocytochemistry or polymerase chain reaction-based methods to detect the presence of these cells in the bone marrow.[1]. Previous studies have demonstrated the robustness of the IE/FACS method for detection and isolation of highly pure CTCs (>90%),[8,9] and downstream molecular analyses have confirmed the malignant nature of IE/FACS-isolated CTCs.[8,9,10]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call