Genomic analysis of oesophageal carcinoma (EC) to identify recurrent mutations in histone methyltransferases as a distinctive subset.

Abstract

379 Background: Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2 (KMT2) family proteins methylate lysine 4 on the histone H3 tail at important regulatory regions in the genome and thereby impart crucial functions through modulating chromatin structures and DNA accessibility, which is associated with tumorigenesis and immune tolerance, indicating its possible correlation with the efficacy of immunotherapy. Recurrent mutations of KMT2 have been identified in EC, but data addressing the molecular features of KMT2 mutated (MT) EC are lacking. We aimed to understand the molecular profile of KMT2 -MT EC. Methods: A total of 787 oesophageal carcinoma [adenocarcinoma (EAC), N=604; squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), N=183] were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was calculated based on somatic nonsynonymous mutations, and mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status was evaluated by a combination of IHC, Fragment analysis and NGS. Results: The mutation spectrum of KMT2A/C/D was significantly different between ESCC and EAC ( KMT2A, 2.7% vs. 1.2%; KMT2C, 3.8% vs. 1.2%; KMT2D, 14.2% vs. 2.0%, P <0.05). KMT2-MT EAC tumors showed significantly higher mutation rates in CIC (13% vs 1.1%), NF1 (12.5% vs 2.2%), FBXW7 (12% vs 3.4%), ATM (11.5% vs 2.6%) and BRCA1 (11.5% vs 1%, all q<0.05), compared to KMT2-WT tumors. However, in ESCC there were no significant differences in gene mutations between the KMT2-MT and WT groups. Significantly higher rates of dMMR/MSI-H (19.2% vs 1.0% in EAC, 5.4% vs. 0% in ESCC, both p<0.01) were seen in both KMT2-MT ESCC and EAC, compared to KMT2-WT cohorts, respectively. TMB was significantly higher in both KMT2-MT ESCC (median: 10 vs 8.6 mut/Mb, P=0.042) and EAC (23.9 vs 8.0 mut/Mb, P<0.0001), compared to KMT2-WT cohorts, respectively. A numerically longer immune-related overall survival was observed in KMT2 -MT EC patients, compared to KMT2 -WT EC patients (9.05 vs 6.98 months, HR=0.744, 95%CI: 0.52-1.07, P =0.11). Conclusions: This is the largest study to investigate the distinct genomic landscapes between KMT2 -MT and WT EC to date. Our data showed the KMT2 -MT EC has a distinctive genetic profile, indicated by higher TMB, and higher frequency of dMMR/MSI-H and gene mutations involved in DDR and epigenetic regulation. Understanding these molecular characteristics may be informative in the development of effective treatment strategies in KMT2 -MT EC.