Abstract
Current procedures for association mapping in plants account for population structure (Q) and kinship (K). Here I propose an association mapping procedure that uses genomewide markers (G) to account for quantitative trait loci (QTL) on background chromosomes. My objective was to determine if the G and QG models are superior to the K and QK models. I simulated mapping population sizes ofN= 384, 768, and 1536 inbreds that belonged to three known subpopulations. The G and QG models showed the best adherence to the significance level (P) specified by the investigator for declaring QTL. Across different genetic models (15 or 30 QTL), population sizes, andPlevels, the Q model suffered from a high number of false positives (NFP). With the K and QK models, a relaxedPlevel led to a reasonable number of true QTL detected (NTQ) withN= 384 or 768 but it led to highNFPwithN= 1536. Compared with the K and QK models, the G and QG models had a better balance between highNTQand lowNFP. The results strongly indicated that the G and QG models are superior to the K and QK models.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.