Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) enters human host cells via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here, through a genome-wide association study, we identify a variant (rs190509934, minor allele frequency 0.2–2%) that downregulates ACE2 expression by 37% (P = 2.7 × 10−8) and reduces the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection by 40% (odds ratio = 0.60, P = 4.5 × 10−13), providing human genetic evidence that ACE2 expression levels influence COVID-19 risk. We also replicate the associations of six previously reported risk variants, of which four were further associated with worse outcomes in individuals infected with the virus (in/near LZTFL1, MHC, DPP9 and IFNAR2). Lastly, we show that common variants define a risk score that is strongly associated with severe disease among cases and modestly improves the prediction of disease severity relative to demographic and clinical factors alone.

Highlights

  • Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which enters human host cells via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)[1]

  • Our analysis provides independent support for several risk variants reported in previous genome-wide association study (GWAS) of COVID-199–11 (Supplementary Table 5), including those recently reported by the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (HGI)[12], to which we contributed an earlier version of these data (Supplementary Table 6)

  • Our analysis identified a new association between a rare variant near the ACE2 gene that decreases expression of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor and COVID-19 risk

Read more

Summary

Results

GWAS of SARS-CoV-2 infection identifies ACE2 association. We performed GWAS of COVID-19 outcomes across 52,630 individuals with COVID-19 and 704,016 individuals with no record of. Of all published genetic risk factors for COVID-19, only one variant was associated with worse outcomes among infected individuals at P < 5 × 10−8 in our analysis (rs73064425 in LZTFL1) but this likely reflects low power due to the small number of patients with severe illness that were available for analysis To address this limitation, we included in the GRS five additional variants (in/near MHC, DPP9, IFNAR2, RPL24 and FOXP4) that (1) had an association with risk of infection at P < 5 × 10−8 in published GWAS or by the HGI; and (2) were associated with worse disease outcomes among infected individuals in our data (Supplementary Tables 15 and 16), albeit at the suggestive level with current sample sizes. In our analyses, age and sex were the strongest predictors of poor outcomes in indi­ viduals with COVID-19 and an elevated GRS enabled a modest improvement in predictions similar to that contributed by indivi­ dual clinical risk factors

Discussion
Methods
Code availability
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call