Abstract

Among the many bacteria naturally competent for transformation by DNA uptake—a phenomenon with significant clinical and financial implications— Pasteurellaceae and Neisseriaceae species preferentially take up DNA containing specific short sequences. The genomic overrepresentation of these DNA uptake enhancing sequences (DUES) causes preferential uptake of conspecific DNA, but the function(s) behind this overrepresentation and its evolution are still a matter for discovery. Here I analyze DUES genome dynamics and evolution and test the validity of the results to other selectively constrained oligonucleotides. I use statistical methods and computer simulations to examine DUESs accumulation in Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae genomes. I analyze DUESs sequence and nucleotide frequencies, as well as those of all their mismatched forms, and prove the dependence of DUESs genomic overrepresentation on their preferential uptake by quantifying and correlating both characteristics. I then argue that mutation, uptake bias, and weak selection against DUESs in less constrained parts of the genome combined are sufficient enough to cause DUESs accumulation in susceptible parts of the genome with no need for other DUES function. The distribution of overrepresentation values across sequences with different mismatch loads compared to the DUES suggests a gradual yet not linear molecular drive of DNA sequences depending on their similarity to the DUES. Other genomically overrepresented sequences, both pro- and eukaryotic, show similar distribution of frequencies suggesting that the molecular drive reported above applies to other frequent oligonucleotides. Rare oligonucleotides, however, seem to be gradually drawn to genomic underrepresentation, thus, suggesting a molecular drag. To my knowledge this work provides the first clear evidence of the gradual evolution of selectively constrained oligonucleotides, including repeated, palindromic and protein/transcription factor-binding DNAs.

Highlights

  • Many bacteria are naturally competent for transformation by spontaneous uptake of DNA from their surrounding environments [1,2]

  • This analysis aims at answering two questions: (i) Do DNA Uptake Enhancing Sequence (DUES) evolve by gradual accumulation of mutations? If so, (ii) what is the minimum number of matches a sequence needs to share with the DUES for its uptake to be significantly preferential?

  • Assuming that there is no interference from other evolutionary forces than mutation and DNA uptake bias, over evolutionary time the latter should leave a trace in the genome in form of significant overrepresentation of the DUES and its mutated yet preferentially taken up forms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many bacteria are naturally competent for transformation by spontaneous uptake of DNA from their surrounding environments [1,2]. Pasteurellaceae and Neisseriaceae species preferentially take up DNA containing specific short sequences, called uptake signal sequences (USS) and DNA uptake sequences (DUS), respectively [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Both USSs and DUSs are overrepresented in their respective genomes and, while only one DUS (59-GCCGTCTGAA) has been described [10,11,12,13], USS was reported in two slightly different versions: (i) 59-AAGTGCGGT in Haemophilus influenzae [13,14,15], Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans [6,9,15], Haemophilus somnus and Pasteurella multocida [15], Mannheimia succiniciproducens [16] and, probably Haemophilus parasuis [16,17] and (ii) 59-ACAAGCGGTC in Mannheimia haemolytica [16,18] and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae [16]. Any transcription termination activity is difficult to envisage for at least three reasons: (i) 65% of H. influenzae and 35% of N. gonorrhoeae

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.