Abstract

Key messageComparative assessment identified naïve interaction model, and naïve and informed interaction GS models suitable for achieving higher prediction accuracy in groundnut keeping in mind the high genotype × environment interaction for complex traits.Genomic selection (GS) can be an efficient and cost-effective breeding approach which captures both small- and large-effect genetic factors and therefore promises to achieve higher genetic gains for complex traits such as yield and oil content in groundnut.A training population was constituted with 340 elite lines followed by genotyping with 58 K ‘Axiom_Arachis’ SNP array and phenotyping for key agronomic traits at three locations in India. Four GS models were tested using three different random cross-validation schemes (CV0, CV1 and CV2). These models are: (1) model 1 (M1 = E + L) which includes the main effects of environment (E) and line (L); (2) model 2 (M2 = E + L + G) which includes the main effects of markers (G) in addition to E and L; (3) model 3 (M3 = E + L + G + GE), a naïve interaction model; and (4) model 4 (E + L + G + LE + GE), a naïve and informed interaction model. Prediction accuracy estimated for four models indicated clear advantage of the inclusion of marker information which was reflected in better prediction accuracy achieved with models M2, M3 and M4 as compared to M1 model. High prediction accuracies (> 0.600) were observed for days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, hundred seed weight, oleic acid, rust@90 days, rust@105 days and late leaf spot@90 days, while medium prediction accuracies (0.400–0.600) were obtained for pods/plant, shelling %, and total yield/plant. Assessment of comparative prediction accuracy for different GS models to perform selection for untested genotypes, and unobserved and unevaluated environments provided greater insights on potential application of GS breeding in groundnut.

Highlights

  • Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a self-pollinated crop, cultivated in > 100 countries worldwide, and has occupied a global area of 28.5 million ha producing 45.95 million tons with the productivity of 1.61 tons/ha during 2018

  • Identification of genetic polymorphism and phenotypic variation in training population Genotyping data with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array have been generated on 318 lines, while phenotyping data were generated for 340 lines

  • Majority of the breeding programs have been relying on phenotype-based selection approaches with some efforts dedicated toward using marker-assisted selection (MAS) or marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC) including groundnut (Pandey et al 2016; Varshney 2016; Varshney et al 2019)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a self-pollinated crop, cultivated in > 100 countries worldwide, and has occupied a global area of 28.5 million ha producing 45.95 million tons with the productivity of 1.61 tons/ha during 2018 (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC). Realizing the limitation associated with MABC and MARS to capture small-effect genetic factors, GS has emerged as the most promising, efficient and costeffective breeding approach which capture both smalland large-effect genetic factors. Apart from it, GS is the only modern genomics-based approach with the potential to accumulate thousands of favorable alleles to develop resilient crop lines with high yield potential. This approach has been utilized extensively in livestock breeding (Hays and Goddard 2010; van der Werf 2013; Hays et al 2013; Meuwissen et al 2016) and is still evolving in plant breeding. If integrated with rapid generation advancement technology such as speed breeding, the GS can make remarkable achievement and positive impact on breeding programs (Watson et al 2019) including groundnut (Pandey et al 2020)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call