Abstract

To delineate the diagnostic efficacy of medical exome, whole exome, and whole genome sequencing according to primary symptoms, the contribution of small copy number variations, and the impact of molecular diagnosis on clinical management. This was a prospective study of 17 tertiary care centers in Japan, conducted between April 2019 and March 2021. Critically ill neonates and infants less than 6months of age were recruited in neonatal intensive care units and in outpatient clinics. The patients underwent medical exome, whole exome, or whole genome sequencing as the first tier of testing. Patients with negative results after medical exome or whole exome sequencing subsequently underwent whole genome sequencing. The impact of molecular diagnosis on clinical management was evaluated through contacting primary care physicians. Of the 85 patients, 41 (48%) had positive results. Based on the primary symptoms, patients with metabolic phenotypes had the highest diagnostic yield (67%, 4/6 patients), followed by renal (60%, 3/5 patients), and neurologic phenotypes (58%, 14/24 patients). Among them, 4 patients had pathogenic small copy number variations identified using whole genome sequencing. In the 41 patients with a molecular diagnosis, 20 (49%) had changes in clinical management. Genome analysis for critically ill neonates and infants had a high diagnostic yield for metabolic, renal, and neurologic phenotypes. Small copy number variations detected using whole genome sequencing contributed to the overall molecular diagnosis in 5% of all the patients. The resulting molecular diagnoses had a significant impact on clinical management.

Highlights

  • MethodsA total of 17 tertiary care centers in metropolitan areas in Japan participated in the study

  • Whole genome sequencing has been increasingly recognized as a powerful diagnostic tool

  • A recent series of genome sequencing studies in critically ill newborns showed various diagnostic rates, ranging from 13% to 50%, with subsequent changes in clinical management occurring in 42%-78% of patients.[3-8]

Read more

Summary

Methods

A total of 17 tertiary care centers in metropolitan areas in Japan participated in the study. The study population was composed of patients who had congenital medical conditions that were first recognized during the neonatal period. Between April 2019 and March 2021, these patients were enrolled while admitted to neonatal intensive care units or while visiting outpatient clinics for follow-ups. The inclusion criteria were undiagnosed neonates with the presence of seizures, persistent jaundice, muscular hypotonia, respiratory distress, metabolic acidosis, hepatosplenomegaly, dysmorphic features, multiple congenital anomalies, or a clinician’s request for genetic analysis. Common alternate medical diagnoses were ruled out before enrollment in the study. The exclusion criteria were newborn infants within 24 hours of birth, malignant tumors, and a known diagnosis obtained using other methods. Gestational age was not used as an exclusion criterion

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call