Abstract
The aim: To highlight legal measures of counteraction to genitals mutilating surgeries (female circumcision) and the perspectives for their possible improvement. Materials and methods: International regulatory legal acts, acts of "soft" law, statistical data, research results are the materials of the research. Comparative, comparative and legal, system analysis, formal and logical, other methods were applied during the research. Conclusions: It has been proved that although there are four different types of female circumcision, any such surgery performed without medical grounds is female genitals mutilating surgery. The authors have offered to enshrine a direct ban on performing genitals mutilating surgeries (female circumcision) in the norms of national legislation with appropriate measures of legal liability for those involved.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
