Abstract

The effective delayed neutron fraction is an important reactor kinetics parameter. In flowing liquid-fuel reactors, this differs from the delayed neutron fraction because of the emission of delayed neutrons with a lower energy spectrum than prompt and the delayed neutron precursor (DNP) drift due to the fuel movement. In general, neglecting delayed neutron precursor drift leads to an over-estimation of the effective delayed neutron fraction. Nevertheless, the capability to simulate this peculiar phenomenon is not available in most reactor physics tools. In this project, a multi-physics approach to modeling DNP drift is developed using the GeN-Foam toolkit, and it benchmarked against available experimental data from the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment (MSRE). GeN-Foam couples a neutron diffusion solver with a thermal-hydraulics solver. Additionally, a new function was added for solving adjoint multi-group diffusion eigenvalue problems and calculating effective delayed neutron fraction. For benchmarking, an R-Z model of the MSRE was developed in GeN-Foam. The porous media model was applied, and cross sections were generated using the Monte Carlo code Serpent-2 with ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data library. In order to evaluate the impact of DNP drift, two steady-state conditions (stationary and flowing salt at 1200 gpm) were simulated. A reactivity change of -241 pcm was calculated using GeN-Foam for the MSRE between static and flowing fuel, which is in a good agreement with the experimental value of -212 pcm. The total effective delayed neutron fraction change was calculated to be -230 pcm vs. -304 pcm reported for the MSRE and analytical calculated during the experimental campaign. Three transient accidents were also analyzed.

Highlights

  • @ AD67D FA 53>5G>3F7 F:7 78875F;H7 67>3K76 @7GFDA@ 8D35F;A@ ;@ $)( F:7 EA>GF;A@ A8 4AF: 8ADI3D6 3@6 36F; 9DAGB 6;88GE;A@ 7;97@H3>G7 BDA4>7?E 3D7 @77676 );@57 F:7 5GDD7@F H7DE;A@ A8 7% A3?

  • 8F7D A4F3;@;@9 F:7 8ADI3D6 3@6 36GJ 6;EFD;4GF;A@ F:7 78875F;H7 67>3K76 @7GFDA@ 8D35F;A@ 8AD =F: %' 9DAGB 53@ 47 53>5G>3F76 3E 8A>>AIE 1 2

  • " 3E 3 D787D7@57 EF3F7 3@6 3 B7DFGD43F76 EF3F7 D7EB75F;H7>K 36ABF;@9 % , @G5>73D 63F3 >;4D3DK I;F: BD7 678;@76 7@7D9K 9DAGB EFDG5FGD7E 6783G>F 9DAGB 3@6 )$& 9DAGB 3@6 E;J 67>3K76 @7GFDA@ BD75GDEAD 9DAGBE *34>7 *:7;D 5ADD7EBA@6;@9 LA@7E ;@ 7% A3?

Read more

Summary

Introduction

@ AD67D FA 53>5G>3F7 F:7 78875F;H7 67>3K76 @7GFDA@ 8D35F;A@ ;@ $)( F:7 EA>GF;A@ A8 4AF: 8ADI3D6 3@6 36F; 9DAGB 6;88GE;A@ 7;97@H3>G7 BDA4>7?E 3D7 @77676 );@57 F:7 5GDD7@F H7DE;A@ A8 7% A3? 8F7D A4F3;@;@9 F:7 8ADI3D6 3@6 36GJ 6;EFD;4GF;A@ F:7 78875F;H7 67>3K76 @7GFDA@ 8D35F;A@ 8AD =F: %' 9DAGB 53@ 47 53>5G>3F76 3E 8A>>AIE 1 2

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call