Abstract

Submitted 2020-07-08 | Accepted 2020-08-15 | Available 2020-12-01 https://doi.org/10.15414/afz.2020.23.mi-fpap.217-223 Feed represents a substantial proportion of the variable costs of pig production. Feed efficiency is traditionally expressed as the feed conversion ratio (FCR) and more recently as residual feed intake (RFI). Although feed efficiency can be generally improved indirectly by selection for increased growth rate and decreased adipose tissue, a higher genetic response could be achieved through direct selection of feed intake traits. The aim of this study was to provide a pilot analysis of feed intake data of 281 Czech Large White boars. Data were recorded individually using the Feed Intake Recording Equipment in field performance testing from 2018 to 2020. The analysed feed intake traits were average daily feed intake (ADFI), FCR and RFI. RFI was calculated as the deviation of observed ADFI and average population ADFI predicted on the basis of the model, with mid-test metabolic weight and average daily gain as regressors. The heritability estimates were 0.35 and 0.34 for ADFI and FCR, respectively, and the estimate was slightly higher (0.43) for RFI. The genetic standard deviations ranged from 100 to 110 g of feed per day and 103 g of feed per kg of weight gain. The amounts of explained variability by environmental effects of jointly tested animals were from 0.20 to 0.46. The sufficient amount of genetic variability and moderate heritability estimates give the possibility for selection of feed intake traits, although a larger number of animals will be essential to estimate more precise breeding values. Keywords: animal breeding, pig selection, genetic parameters, feed conversion ratio, residual feed intake References Cai, W. & Casey, D.S. & Dekkers, J.C.M. (2008). Selection response and genetic parameters for residual feed intake in Yorkshire swine. Journal of Animal Science, 86, 287–98. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0396 Do, D.N. & Strathe, A. B. & Jensen, J. & Mark, T. & Kadarmideen, H.N. (2013). Genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency and related traits in boars of three pig breeds. Journal of Animal Science, 91, 4069-4079. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-6197. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-6197 Gilbert, H.& Bidanel, J.P. & Gruand, J. & Caritez, J.C. & Billon, Y. & Guillouet, P. & Lagant, H. & Noblet, J. & Sellier, P. (2007). Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits. Journal of Animal Science, 85, 3182–3188. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-590 Gilbert H. & Bidanel, J.P. & Billon, Y. & Lagant, H. & Guillouet, P. & Sellier, P.J. & Noblet J. & Hermesch, S. (2012). Correlated responses in sow appetite, residual feed intake, body composition, and reproduction after divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig. Journal of Animal Science, 90, 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4515 Gilbert, H. & Bilon, Y. & Brossard, L. & Faure, J. & Gatellier, P. & Gondret, F. & Labussiere, E. & Lebret, B. & Lefaucheur, L. & Le Floch, N. & Louveau, I. & Merlot, E. & Meunier-Salaün, M.C., Montagne, L. & Mormede, P. & Renaudeau, D.& Riquet, J. & Rogel-Gaillard, C. & van Milgen, J. & Vincent, A. & Noblet, J. (2017). Review: divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig. Animal, 11(9), 1427–1439. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111600286X Groeneveld, E. & Kovač, M. & Mielenz, N. (2008). VCE User’s Guide and Reference Manual, Version 6.0. Available from ftp://ftp.tzv.fal.de/pub/latest_vce/doc/ (accessed Aug 1, 2011). Hoque, M. A. & Kadowaki, H. & Shibata, T. & Oikawa, T. & Suzuki, K. (2009). Genetic parameters for measures of residual feed intake and growth traits in seven generations of Duroc pigs. Livestock Science, 121, 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.05.016 Hoque, M.A. & Suzuki, K. (2009). Genetics of residual feed intake in cattle and pigs: A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 22, 747-755. https://www.ajas.info/upload/pdf/22-101.pdf Jiao, S. & Maltecca,C. & Gray, K.A. & J. P. Cassady (2014). Feed intake, average daily gain, feed efficiency, and real-time ultrasound traits in Duroc pigs: I. Genetic parameter estimation and accuracy of genomic prediction. Journal of Animal Science, 92, 2377–2386. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7338 Kadarmideen, H. N. & Schworer, D. & Ilahi, H. & Malek, M. & Hofer, A. (2004). Genetics of osteochondral disease and its relationship with meat quality and quantity, growth, and feed conversion traits in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 3118–3127. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.82113118x Kennedy, B. W. & van der Werf, J. H. & Meuwissen. T. H. (1993). Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science, 71, 3239–3250. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71123239x Koch, R. M. & Swiger, L. A. & Chambers, D. & Gregory, K.E. (1963). Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 22(2):486–94. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1963.222486x Krupa E, Wolfová M, Krupová Z, Žáková E. (2020). Estimation of economic weights for number of teats and sperm quality traits in pigs. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 137, 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12437 Naou, T. & Le Floc’h, N. & Louveau, I. & Gilbert, H. & Gondret, F. (2012). Metabolic changes and tissue responses to selection on residual feed intake in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 90, 4771–4780. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5226 Neumaier, A. & Groeneveld, E. (1998). Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of covariances in sparse linear models. Genetic Selection Evolution, 30, 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-30-1-3 Patience, J. F. & Rossoni-Serão, M.C. & Gutiérrez, N.A. (2015). A review of feed efficiency in swine: biology and application. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 6, 33. 10.1186/s40104-015-0031-2 Rauw, W.M. & Soler, J. & Tibau, J. & Reixach, J. & Gomez Raya, L. (2006). The relationship between residual feed intake and feed intake behavior in group-housed Duroc barrows. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 956–962. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.844956x Saintilan, I. & Mérour, L. & Brossard, T. & Tribout, J.Y. & Dourmad,P. & Sellier, J. & Bidanel, J. & van Milgen,J. & Gilbert, H. (2013). Genetics of residual feed intake in growing pigs: Relationships with production traits, and nitrogen and phosphorus excretion traits. Journal of Animal Science, 91, 2542–2554. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5687 SAS Institute Inc. (2008). Release 9.2 of the SAS® System for Microsoft® Windows®. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, USA. Strathe, A.B. & Mark, T. & Nielsen, B. & Do, D. N. & Kadarmideen, H. N. & Jensen, J. (2014). Deriving genomic breeding values for residual feed intake from covariance functions of random regression models. In: Proceedings, 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Â

Highlights

  • Feed represents a substantial proportion of the variable costs of pig production (Do et al, 2013)

  • feed conversion ratio (FCR) representing the ratio of feed intake and weight gain is expressed as the inverse trait of the feed intake efficiency during growth

  • Selection pressure oriented towards growth rate and fat content has an indirect impact on FCR (Gilbert et al, 2017)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Feed represents a substantial proportion of the variable costs of pig production (Do et al, 2013). The economic weights of such traits are 16% to 24% of the overall economic importance of growth, reproduction, health and carcass traits in maternal and sire pig breeds (Krupa et al, 2020). In this context, decreasing the pressure of feed costs and reduction of environmental impact are the most significant challenges in the pig sector (Gillert et al, 2017). FCR representing the ratio of feed intake (inputs) and weight gain (output) is expressed as the inverse trait of the feed intake efficiency during growth. Selection pressure oriented towards growth rate and fat content has an indirect impact on FCR (Gilbert et al, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call