Abstract

To perform a systematic review/meta-analysis to elucidate the scientific basis for the association between genetic variations and risk of external apical root resorption (EARR) in orthodontic patients. Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, LILACS) were electronically searched until November 22, 2020, followed by manual and gray literature search.Case-control or cross-sectional studies that evaluated genes involved in the susceptibility of orthodontic patients to EARR were eligible. Tworeviewers applied the inclusion and exclusioncriteria, extracted qualitative data, as well as assessed methodological quality using instrument proposed for genetic studies. For synthesis results, narrative and quantitative data (meta-analysis) wereperformed. The certainty of the evidence was tested using the GRADE Working Group approach. Of 201 articles in total, 16studies were included in the review. Of these, 11 presented moderate and 5 of high methodological quality. Inthe narrativeanalysis, from 16 studies, 15 studies (10 genes) showed a significant association with EARR and 9studies were included in the meta-analysis. Only the polymorphism rs208294 in P2RX7 (dominant model) wasassociated with EARR (OR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.29-0.95, p = 0.03) and presenteda very low certainty of the evidence. Narrativeanalyses of individual studiesdemonstrated an association of many genes. The number of studies for each genetic variation was very low, and methodological heterogeneity between the studieswas observed. Quantitative analyses (meta-analysis) could only show an involvement for P2RX7 (rs208294) in the risk of orthodontic patients to EARR at a very low certainty of evidence. (CRD42018085411). The knowledge regarding the molecular aspects involved in the etiology of EARR will allow orthodontists to use a personalized treatment and early diagnosis of risk patients. This systematic review demonstrates that more studies are necessary to unravel the role of genetic variation for patients' risk to EARR during orthodontic tooth movement.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call