Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: cMET (MNNG HOS Transforming gene) is a proto-oncogene encoding the hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR) with HGF as the only known ligand. Whereas the role of cMET mutations in NSCLC patients remains debated controversively, amplification of cMET is considered as one of the molecular resistance mechanisms in EGFR-mutated NSCLCs treated with 1st or 2nd generation EGFR-TKIs. Further, at least for high-level amplifications, these aberrations might be a possible target for cMET-targeted therapy also in EGFR-wt patients. Nevertheless, much is unknown about the contribution and the impact of cMET amplifications regarding their prognostic or predictive value. Methods: Beside the screening of rebiopsied EGFR-TKI-resistant patients, cMET amplification status as assessed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) was also analyzed in therapy-naive patients. A cohort of 588 patients was analyzed using FISH and next-generation sequencing (NGS). The amplifications were categorized as low-level, intermediate, and high-level amplifications. Results: 171 patients with cMET amplification were identified, whereof 11 (6.4%) had a high-level amplification. cMET amplifications cooccured with a large spectrum of other driver mutations (EGFR, KRAS, HER2, STK11, NRAS, BRAF) or amplifications (FGFR1) in both therapy-naive and treated patients, and smoking status represented the known associations (i. e., low smoking association in patients with EGFR mutations, high association in patients with KRAS and NRAS mutations). The amplifications occurred in both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Preliminary data suggest that low-level amplifications beside EGFR mutations in therapy-naive patients do not alter the predictive value of the EGFR mutation. Conclusions: The preliminary data suggests a higher prevalence of cMET amplifications in a broad spectrum on NSCLC patients. Furthermore, cMET amplifications are not exclusive for EGFR-mutated patients with acquired resistance to EGFR-directed therapy. Preliminary data suggest that low-level amplification does not lead to EGFR-TKI resistance. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.