Genetic Testing in Inherited Arrhythmias: Approach, Limitations, and Challenges

Abstract

Genetic testing is playing an ever-expanding role in cardiovascular care and is becoming part of the “toolkit” for the cardiovascular clinician. In patients with inherited arrhythmias, genetic testing can confirm a suspected diagnosis, establish a diagnosis in unexplained cases, and help facilitate cascade family screening. Many inherited arrhythmia syndromes are monogenic diseases arising from a single pathogenic variant involved in the structure and function of cardiac ion channels or structural proteins. As such, “arrhythmia gene panels” will often cast a wide net for such heritable diseases. However, challenges may arise when genetic testing results are ambiguous, or when genetic testing results (genotype) and clinical phenotypes do not match. In cases of “genotype-phenotype matching,” genetic results complement the clinical phenotype and genetic testing can be used in diagnosis, family screening, and occasionally prognostication. It becomes more challenging when genetic results are negative or noncontributory and “contradict” the clinical phenotype. “Genotype mismatches” can also occur when genotype-positive patients have no clinical phenotype, or when genetic testing results point towards a completely different disease than the clinical phenotype. We discuss an approach to genetic testing and review the challenges that may arise when interpreting genetic testing results. Genetic testing has opened a wealth of opportunities in the diagnosis, management, and cascade screening of inherited arrhythmia syndromes, but has also opened a “Pandora’s box” of challenges. Genetic results should be interpreted with caution and in a multidisciplinary clinic, with support from genetic counsellors and an expert with a focused interest in cardiovascular genetics.