Abstract

Relatives of patients with celiac disease have an increased lifetime risk of developing celiac disease. Repeat screening of relatives would improve diagnosis rates, but at significant cost. Genetic testing before screening would potentially reduce costs by eliminating HLA-DQ2 and DQ8 negative patients who are at extremely low risk for developing celiac disease. A decision tree was developed incorporating 3 diagnostic branches: initial screening with anti-tissue transglutaminase at time t0, repeat screening at time t1, and genetic testing before repeat screening. Costs were estimated using Medicare reimbursement fees. Modeling and sensitivity analyses were performed using Tree Age Pro 2006. The cost of an initial screening with anti-tissue transglutaminase is approximately $434 per person. Repeat screening would cost $683, but would diagnosis an additional 4.4% cases. Genetic testing before screening would cost $750, but would decrease the lower endoscopy workload by nearly 25%. Genetic testing would have to decrease from $301 to $234, a difference of $67, to justify its use before serologic testing. As the specificity of anti-tissue transglutaminase approaches 100%, the cost of genetic testing would have to continue to decrease to less than $200 in order for it to be an affordable option. Repeat screening of relatives with celiac disease results in a significant increase in cost, but also an associated increase in cases diagnosed. Genetic testing would potentially eliminate up to 60% of the population to be screened and, if available at a lower cost, would partially offset costs of repeat serologic screening.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.