Abstract

The paper presents the first tectonophysical reconstruction of initial divisibility of the protolithosphere as a result of convection in the cooling primitive mantle. Initial division of the protolithosphere into separate masses, i.e. prototypes of the blocks, and their size are predetermined by the emerging Rayleigh-Benard convection cells. In studies of geology and geodynamics, the Rayleigh-Benard convection cells were first referred to as a factor to explain the formation of initial continental cores. Considering the Rayleigh-Benard cells and their structural relics can help clarify initial divisibility of the protolithosphere and the origin of the major lithospheric plates, i.e. prototypes of continents. In our opinion, the initial mega-scale block structure of the protolithosphere and the emerging lithosphere were predetermined by the Rayleigh-Benard cells as they were preserved in the emerging lithosphere and their lower boundaries corresponded to the core-mantle boundary, i.e. one of the major discontinuities of the planet. Our theoretical estimations are in good agreement with the number and sizes of the Earth's theorized first supercontinents, Vaalbara and Ur. In our tectonophysical discussion of the formation of the lithospheric block structure, we analyze in detail the map of modern lithospheric plates [ Bird , 2003 ] in combination with the materials from [ Sherman et al., 2000 ]. In the hierarchy of the blocks comprising the contemporary lithosphere, which sizes are widely variable, two groups of blocks are clearly distinguished. The first group includes megablocks with the average geometric size above 6500 km. Their formation is related to convection in the Earth mantle at the present stage of the geodynamic evolution of the Earth, as well as at all the previous stages, including the earliest one, when the protolithosphere emerged. The second group includes medium-sized blocks with the average geometric size of less than 4500 km and those with minimum sizes, such as rock lumps. They reflect primarily the degradation of megablocks as a result of their destruction due to high stresses in excess of the tensile strength of the medium. This group may also include blocks which formation is related to convection in the upper mantle layer, asthenosphere. There are grounds to assume that through the vast intermediate interval of geologic time, including supercycles of Kenorlend, Rodin, and and partically Pangea, the formation of the large lithospheric blocks was controlled by convection, and later on, they were 'fragmented' under the physical laws of destruction of solid bodies. However, it is difficult to clearly distinguish between the processes that predetermine the hierarchy of formation of the block structures of various origins – sizes of ancient lithospheric blocks cannot be estimated unambiguously. Thus, mantle convection is a genetic endogenous source of initial divisibility of the cooling upper cover of the Earth and megablock divisibility of the lithosphere in the subsequent and recent geodynamic development stages. At the present stage, regular patterns of the lithospheric block divisibility of various scales are observed at all the hierarchic levels. The areas of the lithospheric megaplates result from regular changes of convective processes in the mantle, which influenced the formation of plates and plate kinematics. Fragmentation of the megaplates into smaller ones is a result of destruction of the solid lithosphere under the physical laws of destruction of solid bodies under the impact of high stresses.

Highlights

  • Initial divisibility of the Earth protolithosphere, i.e. the cooling outer hard cover of the planet, and its transformation with time into lithospheric blocks have not been properly studied yet in terms of the geody‐ namics of faulting, and tectonic regularities in divisibi‐ lity of the lithospheric blocks of various ranks still need to be clarified

  • Equations 3, 5, 6 and 7 are similar, which suggests that the fragmentation of 'solid' rocks follows a physically uniform pattern, and, in more general terms, there is a tectonophysical law of the fault‐block divisibility of the lithosphere which is valid for litho‐ spheric blocks of a wide range of areas, from blocks which size is compatible with North and South America continents, i.e. nearly as big as lithospheric plates, to lump of rocks observed on small outcropped sites

  • This study is pioneering in tectonophysical recon‐ struction of initial divisibility of the protolithosphere as a result of convection in the cooling primitive mantle

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Initial divisibility of the Earth protolithosphere, i.e. the cooling outer hard cover of the planet, and its transformation with time into lithospheric blocks have not been properly studied yet in terms of the geody‐ namics of faulting, and tectonic regularities in divisibi‐ lity of the lithospheric blocks of various ranks still need to be clarified. In the majority of problems solved by geodynamics, it is assumed that convection cells occupy the entire mantle or partially occupy the layer or occur between the layers [Kirdyashkin, Dobretsov, 1991; Dobretsov et al, 2001; Trubitsyn V.P., Trubitsyn A.P., 2014] In such conditions, the main factor predetermining convection is viscosity of the medium, which is included in equations of interre‐ lated Rayleigh, Grashof and Prandtl numbers. The main factor predetermining convection is viscosity of the medium, which is included in equations of interre‐ lated Rayleigh, Grashof and Prandtl numbers It can sig‐ nificantly increase or decrease their values and change the stability of convection . The merger of the two descending cooling flows leads to further thickening of the emerging cap, and the partition between emerging blocks of the lithosphere is fixed

THE ORIGIN OF THE FIRST LARGEST LOCAL STRUCTURES
GENETIC SOURCES OF THE LITHOSPHERE
DISCUSSION
Findings
CONCLUSION
10. REFERENCES

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.