Abstract

To characterize environmental carcinogens, there is a need to distinguish monofunctional genotoxic agents from those having cross-linking potential, because chemicals which can cross-link DNA are among the most potent carcinogens in rodents [Barbin and Bartsch, 1989] and humans [Allen et al., 1988; Kaldor et al., 1988]. Here we provide a genetic method for a pre-classification of genotoxins with respect to their functionality--monofunctional versus cross-linking. The procedure is based on the determination of relative clastogenic efficiency by a two-endpoint comparison in Drosophila: (i) induction of chromosome loss (CL), (ii) incidence of recessive lethal mutations (RL). Analysis of CL/RL ratios of 53 genotoxins, all mutagens in Drosophila, permitted distinction of 45 into two major categories: (i) 21 monofunctional agents with CL/RL indices generally < or = 1; (ii) 24 agents with ratios > 2 exhibiting DNA cross-linking properties. Within the group of monofunctional agents, CL/RL ratios tend to be low for SN1 agents, i.e., for N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea, N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, and for N-nitrosodiethylamine. With cross-linking agents, the number of reactive groups appeared of minor importance as bi-, tri-, and tetrafunctional agents showed no significant differences in their CL/RL indices. Among 8 chemicals which could not be grouped into one of the two categories are two (adriamycin, daunomycin) regarded as intercalating agents. It is concluded that this two-endpoint analysis in Drosophila has prognostic value and can assist in the characterization of genotoxic agents with unknown mode of action.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call