Genetic introgression, incomplete lineage sorting and faulty taxonomy create multiple cases of polyphyly in a montane clade of tyrant‐flycatchers (Elaenia, Tyrannidae)

Abstract

Species‐level paraphyly and polyphyly are pervasive phenomena in modern phylogenetic research and can be due to a number of factors. We explore a complicated pattern of nuclear and mitochondrial polyphyly in montane Neotropical Elaenia flycatchers. Using a combination of phylogenetic and population genetic methods, we demonstrate that no single factor is sufficient to account for this pattern of polyphyly, and that it is likely based on an interplay of three different factors: (i) faulty taxonomy which has led to the recognition of two polyphyletic species that are better classified as four biological species; (ii) a late Pleistocene hybridization event that resulted in two morphologically and ecologically distinct species sharing extremely similar mitochondrial DNA but distinct nuclear DNA profiles; and (iii) incomplete lineage sorting in a nuclear marker that results in a polyphyletic placement of species that are otherwise well‐differentiated in mitochondrial DNA, morphology and ecology. Additionally, we demonstrate that the two clades of montane Elaenia exhibit a reverse pattern of mitochondrial and nuclear diversity, with high mitochondrial and low nuclear genetic diversity in one clade and vice versa in the other clade. A possible cause for this pattern is differences in population histories, with large panmictic population structures being conducive to the retention of ancient nuclear polymorphisms in Elaenia albiceps chilensis.