Abstract

Selection for survivors percent egg production from first egg to 40 weeks of age was conducted for six generations. Within-line selection (WLS) on the basis of an index of individual records plus sire family and dam family means was compared with reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS) based on sire family selection among cross progeny. Genetically heterogeneous synthetic populations, the Cornell Control and the Purdue Pool strains were used.The responses to WLS (3.84 °) and RRS (2.57 °) were both significantly greater than zero, but were not significantly different from each other. Nevertheless, the responses were proportional to their predicted values (.363 vs. 340). The advantage of WLS was due to the mechanics of selection resulting in slightly greater selection intensity and an increased correlation between the criterion of selection and the trait being improved. On the contrary, the RRS method had a slightly larger realized heritability as would be expected in the presence of non-additive genetic variance. Four of five pure-lines selected under both methods had statistically significant declines in performance due to inbreeding depression effects. All of the results observed are comparable with known genetic theory.Some problems in comparing genetic gains from different selection methods or selection criteria are discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call