Abstract
We compared the epilepsy phenotypes in children with genetically defined versus undefined autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A single-center retrospective study was conducted to investigate diagnostic yields of different genetic testing for children with ASD. Patients with at least one testing modality were included and classified as having genetically defined ASD or not based on updated genotype-phenotype correlation. Of the 523 patients included, 79 (15.1%) had results explaining their ASD diagnosis. WES (whole exome sequencing) outperformed CMA (chromosomal microarray) on diagnostic yield (23.0% versus 8.3%). Compared to those with non-diagnostic test(s), children with genetically defined ASD were associated with higher rates for microcephaly, hypotonia, dysmorphic features, and developmental delay/regression. The prevalence of epilepsy was significantly higher in children with genetically defined ASD than those without a genetic diagnosis (35.4% versus 16.4%, p < 0.001, power = 0.97). Furthermore, children with genetically defined ASD had a younger age of epilepsy onset (median 2.2 versus 5.0years, p = 0.002, power = 0.90) and a higher rate of drug-resistant epilepsy although not reaching statistical significance (35.7% versus 21.9%, p = 0.20). Our study has provided further evidence to support WES as first-tier test for children with ASD and that an early genetic diagnosis has the potential to inform further surveillance and management for ASD comorbid conditions including epilepsy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.