Abstract
SummaryBackgroundHuman genome sequencing has transformed our understanding of genomic variation and its relevance to health and disease, and is now starting to enter clinical practice for the diagnosis of rare diseases. The question of whether and how some categories of genomic findings should be shared with individual research participants is currently a topic of international debate, and development of robust analytical workflows to identify and communicate clinically relevant variants is paramount.MethodsThe Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) study has developed a UK-wide patient recruitment network involving over 180 clinicians across all 24 regional genetics services, and has performed genome-wide microarray and whole exome sequencing on children with undiagnosed developmental disorders and their parents. After data analysis, pertinent genomic variants were returned to individual research participants via their local clinical genetics team.FindingsAround 80 000 genomic variants were identified from exome sequencing and microarray analysis in each individual, of which on average 400 were rare and predicted to be protein altering. By focusing only on de novo and segregating variants in known developmental disorder genes, we achieved a diagnostic yield of 27% among 1133 previously investigated yet undiagnosed children with developmental disorders, whilst minimising incidental findings. In families with developmentally normal parents, whole exome sequencing of the child and both parents resulted in a 10-fold reduction in the number of potential causal variants that needed clinical evaluation compared to sequencing only the child. Most diagnostic variants identified in known genes were novel and not present in current databases of known disease variation.InterpretationImplementation of a robust translational genomics workflow is achievable within a large-scale rare disease research study to allow feedback of potentially diagnostic findings to clinicians and research participants. Systematic recording of relevant clinical data, curation of a gene–phenotype knowledge base, and development of clinical decision support software are needed in addition to automated exclusion of almost all variants, which is crucial for scalable prioritisation and review of possible diagnostic variants. However, the resource requirements of development and maintenance of a clinical reporting system within a research setting are substantial.FundingHealth Innovation Challenge Fund, a parallel funding partnership between the Wellcome Trust and the UK Department of Health.
Highlights
The increasing use of whole exome and whole genome sequencing in both research[1,2] and clinical practice[3,4,5] raises questions about how to maximise the diagnostic usefulness of genomic data and how to share results with research participants and patients
The Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) study has developed a UK-wide patient recruitment network involving over 180 clinicians across all 24 regional genetics services, and has performed genome-wide microarray and whole exome sequencing on children with undiagnosed developmental disorders and their parents
To achieve equity of access for all undiagnosed families with developmental disorders in the British Isles, every UK National Health Service (NHS) regional genetics service was involved in supporting and setting up the study; Ireland was subsequently added after the study had started
Summary
The increasing use of whole exome and whole genome sequencing in both research[1,2] and clinical practice[3,4,5] raises questions about how to maximise the diagnostic usefulness of genomic data and how to share results with research participants and patients. It is increasingly deemed ethically desirable to return clinically useful results to research participants.[6] return of individual genomic results poses major logistical challenges. Health-related findings from a human genome could potentially include thousands of variants pertaining to hundreds of different conditions,[7] almost none of which provide clinically useful information for a specific individual.[8] A first step toward addressing these challenges is to separate potential genomic findings into those that are pertinent to a particular disease investigation and those that are non-pertinent (or incidental) to that disease. Many commentators have debated the merits of returning different classes of findings from large research studies and biobanks,[6,9,10] none has yet provided a scalable
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.