Abstract

BackgroundThe cerebellum is a foliated posterior brain structure involved in coordination of motor movements and cognition. The cerebellum undergoes rapid growth postnataly due to Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling-dependent proliferation of ATOH1+ granule cell precursors (GCPs) in the external granule cell layer (EGL), a key step for generating cerebellar foliation and the correct number of granule cells. Due to its late development, the cerebellum is particularly vulnerable to injury from preterm birth and stress around birth. We recently uncovered an intrinsic capacity of the developing cerebellum to replenish ablated GCPs via adaptive reprogramming of Nestin-expressing progenitors (NEPs). However, whether this compensation mechanism occurs in mouse mutants affecting the developing cerebellum and could lead to mis-interpretation of phenotypes was not known.MethodsWe used two different approaches to remove the main SHH signaling activator GLI2 in GCPs: 1) Our mosaic mutant analysis with spatial and temporal control of recombination (MASTR) technique to delete Gli2 in a small subset of GCPs; 2) An Atoh1-Cre transgene to delete Gli2 in most of the EGL. Genetic Inducible Fate Mapping (GIFM) and live imaging were used to analyze the behavior of NEPs after Gli2 deletion.ResultsMosaic analysis demonstrated that SHH-GLI2 signaling is critical for generating the correct pool of granule cells by maintaining GCPs in an undifferentiated proliferative state and promoting their survival. Despite this, inactivation of GLI2 in a large proportion of GCPs in the embryo did not lead to the expected dramatic reduction in the size of the adult cerebellum. GIFM uncovered that NEPs do indeed replenish GCPs in Gli2 conditional mutants, and then expand and partially restore the production of granule cells. Furthermore, the SHH signaling-dependent NEP compensation requires Gli2, demonstrating that the activator side of the pathway is involved.ConclusionWe demonstrate that a mouse conditional mutation that results in loss of SHH signaling in GCPs is not sufficient to induce long term severe cerebellum hypoplasia. The ability of the neonatal cerebellum to regenerate after loss of cells via a response by NEPs must therefore be considered when interpreting the phenotypes of Atoh1-Cre conditional mutants affecting GCPs.

Highlights

  • The cerebellum is a foliated posterior brain structure involved in coordination of motor movements and cognition

  • First we used the R26FSF-GFPcre MASTR allele (R26MASTR) [40] and a Atoh1-FlpoER transgene to knock out Gli2 in scattered granule cell precursor (GCP) at ~P3 by administering Tamoxifen (Tm) at P2 and analyzed the percentage of undifferentiated Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP)+ GCPs (GFP+ cells in the proliferating outer external granule cell layer (EGL)/total GFP+ cells – proliferating and post mitotic) at both P4 and P8 (Fig. 1a-c)

  • We did observe a significant decrease in the percentage of GFP+ cells that were GCPs in the medial CB of P8 Atoh1-M-Gli2 Conditional knockout (CKO) (R26MASTR/+; Atoh1-FlpoER/+; Gli2flox/flox mice; n = 3;) compared to Atoh1-M-Gli2 heterozgous controls (R26MASTR/+; Atoh1-FlpoER/+; Gli2flox/+ mice; n = 3) (29.79% compared to 67.09%) (Fig. 1d)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The cerebellum is a foliated posterior brain structure involved in coordination of motor movements and cognition. We recently uncovered an intrinsic capacity of the developing cerebellum to replenish ablated GCPs via adaptive reprogramming of Nestinexpressing progenitors (NEPs). Whether this compensation mechanism occurs in mouse mutants affecting the developing cerebellum and could lead to mis-interpretation of phenotypes was not known. The CB undergoes its major growth in the third trimester and infant stage in humans, and the first 2 weeks after birth in mice, primarily due to expansion of the granule cell precursor (GCP) pool in the external granule cell layer (EGL) [8,9,10]. Given the late development of the CB compared to other brain regions, the CB is sensitive to environmental and clinical factors that impact on growth (or cause injury) around birth. Intrinsic growth compensation mechanisms involving lineages where the gene does not function could obscure the normal function of a gene in cerebellar growth

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call