Genetic covariances within and between species: indirect selection for hybrid inviability

Abstract

AbstractGenotype‐environment interactions and natural selection can result in local specialization when different genotypes are favored in different environments. Restricted gene flow or genetic subdivision enhances local genetic diversification across a species when natural selection acts on such variation. The indirect evolution of reproductive isolation and the restriction of gene flow between species in statu nascendi may provide a central role for genotype‐environment interactions in speciation genetics. We derive the expected genetic covariance between heterospecific and conspecific viability fitness under several different models of selection, dominance, and breeding structure. Standard quantitative genetic methods can be used to estimate these covariances in experimental studies. These genetic covariances permit us to evaluate in a formal way the indirect effects of selection within a species on the evolution of hybrid inviability between species. We find that, for autosomal loci and random mating, the genetic covariance across species is equal to the product of three quantities: (1) the viability of the best hybrid genotype; (2) the viability effect of an allele in hybrids; and, (3) the change in allele frequency due to selection in the conspecific population. Inbreeding within the conspecific population, expressed as Wright's coefficient, F, increases the genetic covariance by a factor (1 + F). In all cases, a negative genetic covariance across species is evidence for hybrid inviability evolving as an indirect effect of selection within species for adaptive (as opposed to neutral) genetic change.“It is an irony of evolutionary genetics, that although it is a fusion of Mendelism and Darwinism, it has made no direct contribution to what Darwin obviously saw as the fundamental problem: the origin of species…. While it is a question of elementary population genetics to state how many generations will be required for the frequency of an allele to change from q1 to q2, we do not know how to incorporate such a statement into speciation theory, in large part because we know virtually nothing about the genetic changes that occur in species formation.”(Lewontin 1974, p. 159)