Abstract

Abstract Antibody responses to the multichain synthetic polypeptide poly (L Tyr, L Glu)-poly L Pro-poly L Lys, (T, G)-Pro--L, and to the Pro-L portion of the related polymer poly (L Phe, L Glu)-poly L Pro--poly L Lys, (Phe, G)-Pro--L, are controlled by the dominant, autosomal, non-H-2-linked, Ir-3 gene. SJL/J and DBA/1 mice are the respective high and low responder strains to Pro-L. Injection of low responder DBA/1 mice with 300 µg poly(A)·poly(U) 24 hr after immunization with either of these immunogens resulted in an enhancement of DBA/1 anti-Pro--L titers which were indistinguishable from those of untreated or poly(A)·poly(U)-treated SJL/J mice. In contrast, no effect of poly(A)·poly(U) on enhancing the antibody responses to poly (L Phe, L Glu)-poly DL Ala--poly L Lys, (Phe, G)-A-L, or to the (Phe, G) immunopotent region of (Phe, G)-Pro-L (immune responses controlled by the H-2-linked Ir-1 gene) was obtained. The anti-Pro--L response was also enhanced in another low responder strain, DBA/2. Thus, the effects of poly(A)·poly(U) described here are selective for phenotypic “correction” of antibody responses controlled by the Ir-3 gene only, and confirm that the modes of action of the Ir-1 and Ir-3 genes are distinct. Enhancement of the DBA/1 anti-Pro--L response using (Phe, G)-Pro-L, which contains two immunopotent regions, occurred at the expense of the anti-(Phe, G) response. Limiting dilution patterns of low responder spleen and marrow cells were quantitatively and qualitatively affected by administering poly(A)·poly(U) to the syngeneic hosts 24 hr after immunization with (T, G)-Pro--L. No effect of the polynucleotide was detected for dilutions of SJL/J high responder spleen cells, nor for those of DBA/1 low responder thymocytes. The lack of effect of poly(A)·poly(U) on thymocytes was verified in a two-step experimental design by exposing the thymocytes to antigen and the polynucleotide in the absence of marrow cells, followed by transferring the thymus-derived and marrow cells to irradiated test recipients. These results, as well as those (published elsewhere) for the Pro--L specific response, are compatible with the hypothesis that the immunologic effect of the Ir-3 gene is expressed at the level of cell-to-cell interaction, and that poly(A)·poly(U) immunologically “corrects” expression of this gene by making the interaction of the complementary cell types more effective.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.