Abstract

Abstract. Alternative selection strategies for a three-way cross in pigs (Pietrain as the sire line and Large White boars mated to German Landrace sows to produce the F1-female) are investigated to maximise both genetic gain and profit. The number of nucleus sows in the main female line (German Landrace) can vary within a wide range without noticeable effect on the genetic and economic response. Productive lifetimes of approximately one year are recommended for nucleus boars and sows after the progeny test. Boars mated to produce crossbreds should be used longer, especially in the terminal sire line. F1-sows can have a productive lifetime of more than two years and can be used close to their biological maximum. Four testing schemes are compared and the contribution of the three breeds to the return is evaluated. Testing crossbred animals at a central test Station cannot be recommended. This capacity should be used to test purebred animals. Both monetary genetic gain and profit are higher in a scheme with a self-performance testing of boars at Station, in comparison to a scheme with only progeny testing at Station, by 36 and 68%, respectively. Due to a reduced generation interval, using boars to produce breeding boars straight after their self-performance test leads to a further increase of monetary genetic gain by 5% and profit by 13%. In all schemes, selection in Pietrain leads to the highest return due to the highest gene proportion in and its shorter distance to the terminal product and the therefore faster transfer of genetic gain.

Highlights

  • Different genetic improvement schemes for pigs are to be evaluated and compared both for their efficiency in making genetic progress and for their return and profit for the investment made in genetic selection

  • Large White boars mated to German Landrace sows to produce the F|-female)

  • The aim of the present paper is to report first on the effect of optimise the nucleus size of German Landrace sows and the productive lifetime of various selection groups with respect to the genetic and economic response

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Different genetic improvement schemes for pigs are to be evaluated and compared both for their efficiency in making genetic progress and for their return and profit (or net present value) for the investment made in genetic selection. While alternatives have been relatively well investigated regarding their impact on genetic gain (THIELE, 1983; ENGLISCH and FECHNER, 1983; ROEHE, 1991; BRISBANE and GIBSON, 1995), there have been few studies where costs are taken into aecount. These studies were related mostly to purebred situations (NIEBEL and FEWSON, 1979), whereas selection of lines within a crossbreeding scheme was rarely investigated (TRAPPMANN, 1978; WUENSCH et al, 1998). The contribution of the three breeds to these criteria and to the genetic gain for single traits will be presented

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call