Abstract
Gas sensor arrays, also known as electronic noses, leverage a diverse set of materials to identify the components of complex gas mixtures. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as promising materials for electronic noses due to their high-surface areas and chemical as well as structural tunability. Using our recently reported genetic algorithm design approach, we examined a set of 50 MOFs and searched through over 1.125 × 1015 unique array combinations to identify optimal arrays for the detection of CO2 in air. We found that despite individual MOFs having lower selectivity for O2 or N2 relative to CO2, intelligently selecting the right combinations of MOFs enables accurate prediction of the concentrations of all components in the mixture (i.e., CO2, O2, N2). We also analyzed the physical properties of the elements in the arrays to develop an intuition for improving array design. Notably, we found that an array whose MOFs have diversity in their volumetric surface areas has improved sensing. Consistent with this observation, we found that the best arrays consistently had greater structural diversity (e.g., pore sizes, void fractions, and surface areas) than the worst arrays.
Highlights
There has been continued interest in addressing the challenge of recreating the gas-sensing capabilities of a biological nose via a gas-sensing array, known as an electronic nose [1,2,3]
As a baseline for understanding how well the Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) we had selected perform for CO2 sensing, we examined the performance of all 1-element arrays, which is to say we examined how well each of the MOFs can individually predict the composition as a stand-alone sensor
We have described a methodology for screening gas sensing arrays of MOFs, for the detection of CO2 in air
Summary
There has been continued interest in addressing the challenge of recreating the gas-sensing capabilities of a biological nose via a gas-sensing array, known as an electronic nose [1,2,3]. Unlike other gas-sensing technologies, such as gas chromatography (GC) or mass spectroscopy (MS), which can be slow, expensive, and are largely not portable, an electronic nose can be small, cheap, and provide real-time sensing [1,4]. There are numerous applications where an electronic nose would not need to compete with a biological nose, but rather perform in ways where current gas-sensing technologies are insufficient, whether due to a long response time or lack of sensitivity, such as in disease detection [4,5,6,7], or due to a lack of portability, such as for emergency response [8], agriculture [6,9,10], and mobile robots [10,11,12]. With geologic carbon sequestration gaining traction as a viable carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology to mitigate the greenhouse gas effect of CO2 , the need to detect leaks from storage sites grows with it [16,17,18]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
