Abstract

Nitrogen is a major nutrient regulating the physiological processes of plants. Although various partial least squares regression (PLSR) models have been proposed to estimate the leaf nitrogen content (LNC) from hyperspectral data with good accuracies, they are unfortunately not robust and are often not applicable to novel datasets beyond which they were developed. Selecting informative bands has been reported to be critical to refining the performance of the PLSR model and improving its robustness for general applications. However, no consensus on the optimal band selection method has yet been reached because the calibration and validation datasets are very often limited to a few species with small sample sizes. In this study, we address the question based on a relatively comprehensive joint dataset, including a simulation dataset generated from the recently developed leaf scale radiative transfer model (PROSPECT-PRO) and two public online datasets, for assessing different informative band selection techniques on the informative band selection. The results revealed that the goodness-of-fit of PLSR models to estimate LNC could be greatly improved by coupling appropriate band-selection methods rather than using full bands instead. The PLSR models calibrated from the simulation dataset with informative bands selected by genetic algorithm (GA) and uninformative variable elimination (UVE) method were reliable for retrieving the LNC of the two independent field-measured datasets as well. Particularly, GA was more effective to capture the informative bands for retrieving LNC from hyperspectral data. These findings should provide valuable insights for building robust PLSR models for retrieving LNC from hyperspectral remote sensing data.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call